The official website of A. B. Gayle - Author and Editor
Share this:
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • My Books
  • Free Reads
  • Blogs
    • Tyler Knoll's Blog
    • Interviews
    • Reviews
  • Man 'em up Dude
    • Leather + Lace >
      • Chapter 1: Stand Back
    • Red + Blue >
      • R+B - Reviews & Blogs
    • Caught >
      • Caught - Reviews & Blogs
    • Initiation
  • SciFiRomance
    • WIP - Nature
  • Mainstream
    • In Search of the Perfect PinotG!
    • The Lost Diary of Thomas Kendall
  • Coming Soon
    • WIP - Home+Away
    • WIP - Pride+Prejudices
    • WIP - Truth+Lies
  • Bio
    • Links
  • Editing Info
    • Editing Special Forces

Grilled habu with a lot of Spice

4/16/2014

18 Comments

 
Picture
Lately, I’ve enjoyed reading a stack of habu’s books and wanted to find out a bit more about him and his writing. Here is his Goodreads bio:

habu, a bisexual former supersonic spy jet pilot, intelligence agent, academic, mainstream book editor, and diplomat, is a published mainstream novelist, short story writer, and essayist under other names and in another dimension of his life. He has lived extensively in East and Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and Europe as an embassy-based intelligence agent, which influences the settings and plots of many of his stories. He now lives in a picturesque and historical Midatlantic/Upper South state university town, with an accommodating spouse, where he writes, edits, teaches, and indulges himself.

Under the habu name he writes a full spectrum—and heat level—of M/M and bisexual works for the publishing houses of Excessica and BarbarianSpy. He also writes M/M historicals under the pen name Dirk Hessian, and M/M romance with coauthor Sabb under the pen name Shabbu.

For a loosely constructed travel through habu's professional life, read his “Flying High, Diving Deep”

I sent him a whole stack of questions and was overjoyed when he answered.

AB: First off, is there a need to be careful what you say or disclose because of your agency background?

H: There is a need to be “sort of” careful about my past. I was an overt employee of the Agency—had an overt job with them (with covert elements in it that just weren’t publicly acknowledged), but when I write, I use the essence of operations and relationships and settings—but not specific operations. Most are taken from open-source media coverage of events, though, and thus are free game. I have a whole series of spy novels in the mainstream that I passed through Agency clearance, so I know where the allowable edges are in publishing. Beyond that, there is the “NSA” syndrome working. Citizens are aghast at the revelation of the extent of NSA surveillance on them. It’s gone on for, like, forever, though, and folks who have been on the inside, as I have been, know that the collection effort and take are so huge that there’s nearly a zero possibility that the dots would be connected on me—or that anyone would see me as someone worth pursuing—I know I’m not doing anything actionable. And leading from that, what I write from in my spy writings isn’t activity the Agency wants publicly discussed anyway, so that’s insurance in itself. I can write a lot of truth that the general populace insists is fantasy.

AB: I gather members of the SAS never admit to being part of the regiment and always talk down what they do, even to family and friends. Is it the same in the agency, everyone is a data analyst never a field operative?

H: Most Agency—and other intelligence organizations—employees are actually overt employees. The covert ones won’t own up to covert work, no. But there’s a layer of overt employees who also do this and that on the covert side—not to the extent that Tom Clancy drew them in his novels, though. These employees use the overt work to cover anything else. In my case, when I worked overseas, there was veneer of “cultural affairs officer” that was spread over everything I did—and much of what I did (and used as an opening to do other things) was legitimately cultural affairs. (It just gave more meaning to the “affairs” word that most would assume.)

AB: Has agency work made you more cynical?

H: Yes, my work in intelligence did make me quite cynical—and jaded.

Picture
AB: Fetish Galore was the first of yours that I read. Was that just a compilation of kink stories you'd written at that time, or did you write them specifically?

H: Fetish Galore is a compendium of stories addressing the breadth of what I would put into GM fetish. Many of the stories existed before I put the anthology together. Others were written subsequently for this collection to add new fetishes.

AB: What aspect about BDSM appeals to you as a writer and/or as a participant? Physically and/or psychologically.

H: Dealing with the forbidden, in general, appeals to me as a writer. But while personally,  I have no problem with things like multiple partners in succession. I am not into full on BDSM.

Some mild bondage (where I could break free if/when I really wanted to) appealed to me as a participant, but I’m not really much into fear, delayed satisfaction, violence, or physical pain 

I don’t mind role playing of being incapacitated and taken, in a sense, against my will. But that isn’t a rape sensation for me—it’s one combining having no share of the guilt that it’s happening and the awe of having some hunk so out of control in wanting me that he’d do this. When it spills over into physical torture, it moves more into a hate category, and I don’t go there except in my writing to serve a particular audience.

Mind you, I can be aroused in doing so. 

AB: You mention trying the sounds so you would know what they were like but not liking that loss of control, yet, your characters are often depicted as having to submit to a stronger person, isn't that a form of losing control?

H: I was a spy. *smile* I see it as a form of controlling the “needy/almost out of control” taker in his actions. When one of my sub characters submits, it’s happening in my mind as a “Ha, now I’ve got you, you big, beautiful hunk.” This is bread and butter tradecraft. Give them what they want under the conditions where they think they are in control, and they’ll let their guard down and spill their guts, thinking they control and are safe. I pretty much establish in my stories that what the sub wants to come away with is a good fucking, so if he does, it wasn’t really a very good BDSM sub situation.

Picture
A fetish of mine is a smaller man (doesn’t have to be younger but he often is in my stories to reach that audience) being controlled and taken by a bigger man. I’m not a small man myself, but I did gravitate to men who were more muscular than I was and older (more experienced).

I write my sounding stories because I read more than once that there is a scarcity in the market for such works. I’m a writer; I go toward the underserved markets when I can do so and still enjoy the story weaving.

AB: Flying High is described as a semi-factual memoir. Do you or, did you, find writing these books cathartic?

H: Yes, the stories in Flying High (which is out in two editions from two different publishers and two similar but different titles) were cathartic. I had all of these memories bottled up inside me. In discussions with my cyber “other” (who is Sabb, also one of my publishers and a coauthor of GM erotica) experiences long dormant inside me were being pulled out and written up in story form, using the essence of real life in real life settings. These surfaced at various times and were assembled into Flying High. Since writing that, Sabb has “pulled” more from me which now appear as other stories that filled chronological holes. If I added these, the work would be twice as long.

When these get pulled out of me, I look back and think both that, god, I was having a good time in my sexually active life (which didn’t start until I was almost 30) and, god was I ever a slut. Both of those thoughts make me smile, though.

AB: Which do you think is your best book/anthology?

H: This is really hard to answer, as I don’t feel I’ve written too many duds (As any narcissistic writer would think.)—and I have well over 100 works of erotica in pen names in the market. I like my use of history and unnamed famous people, mostly ones I’ve had the privilege of meeting, in my novellas and novellas—such as Homeward Bound (paralleling Thomas Wolfe), The Handyman (a construct of gay male (GM) activity in a New England town over centuries), Brambleton (a takeoff on the relationships and emotions in Brideshead Revisited), Cairo Surrender (bringing up Cairo of the 20s and depicting bondage, seduction, and domination) and Home to Fire Island, are ones by habu that I consider to be literary and favorites of mine.

Picture
Dirk Hessian’s Constantinople was deeply researched and came out quite well, I thought. Luther uses perceptions of the weakness and vulnerability of mental disability to turn the concept on its head and, I hope, to amuse in a way that has the reader cheering for Luther. I’ll have to stop there, but I could go on—nearly every one of my books was written to explore some theme and is like a child to me.

Concerning anthologies, I write two different kinds (and I also write ongoing series, like my Clint Folsom detective series). One kind of anthology is truly standalone stories—and I write two varieties of that. The themed anthologies have an overarching concept to them: first time, fetishes, rough stories, romances, geographical regions, time periods, I even have one where each story features dogs, and so forth. 

I think Bitten Peach, all-oriental stories, many from ancient times, is a standout in this grouping—as is Man’s Man, the stories of an unabashed high-market male hooker. But I have to slap my hand not to pull out six or seven others I think are notable. Then there is my Grab Bag, eclectic collection anthologies, which are composed of loose stories dropping from my muse over a period of time. The fifth edition of this comes out soon, and the sixth one is already building.

AB: You've already mentioned that you've done a few versions of Tuscan Twilight. I can see how you could twist the end with various motives and changing the sexes of the participants. What does this spring from? Is it a fascination with motives? Is it a lag over from your days as an analyst?

Picture
H: As a writer, I like to recast the same scenario with a different theme or emphasis. With Tuscan Twilight—designed to show with separate chapters how the separate sexual preferences can travel through a coherent story line—I saw that one of these stories, extracted and recast, for the Fifty Seventy anthology could work with a skewed theme and setup. I was quite pleased with the original, and I could be quite pleased with a repurposing recast—and be quite pleased with both of them as well. The original wasn’t sacrosanct.

Might add, on my writing technique, that I don’t agonize on a draft. A write, a review, and off to the editor. When it comes back, unlike most people who are faced with trimming, I add detail. But, again, I don’t do a lot of rewrites. I lose my voice and the spontaneity of the storytelling when I do that.

AB: Another one along this line is the Egyptian Initiation/Indian Doctor/Witness for the Prosecution where the same scenario is used, but in the latter, the question of guilt and non-con vs dub-con comes in. First off, on a slightly different slant, if this happened in real life, have your feelings/attitude toward it changed and has this led to these variations?

H: The “Egyptian Initiation” version of this storyline—which, yes, comes out of my initial, surprised, and total deflowering in male-male sex uses an Egyptian because I wasn’t quite ready in the initial story to acknowledge that he was an Indian. At the time,  I wasn’t comfortable with my contact with Indians (Asian Indians) hence it was all the more mysterious that it was an Indian who seduced me—and not just in a fumbling one-time event, but in a progression of takings in nearly every way possible—that I kept coming back for.

I pretty quickly saw this as a release of the floodgates on what I wanted—and was too taken with myself to even realize that. I see it now as a welcome release too, so I guess my attitude hasn’t changed, no. But I was 28, married to a much more openly experienced woman, and had been so narcissistic that I hadn’t realized before then when I was being hit on by both women and men. So the change in attitude came at that point, I guess—being, essentially, seduced by my to-be wife.

AB: Do you enjoy stretching yourself as a writer, for example “New Man at the Village Café” from RoughRiders. How do you describe that? Second person POV? The narrator addresses the reader as if they are the other character?]

H: I approach every write from the aspect of “what new element/style/ technique/scenario/theme/ emotion/ atmosphere” can I bring to this. I think the “New Man” is probably my most hated work by most readers. But I think the emotions are as real as they are raw and that they expose an aspect of the actively cruising gay lifestyle.

Second person only works for me in highly charged, very short bursts of a story. I write in third person sometimes, but I find first person the most intimate and often find myself drifting into that even when I’m writing third person. I don’t sit down and think about what person to write in when I begin a story, though. I don’t think about any technical issue when I sit down and write a story. I just sit down and start writing and let it go its natural way.

AB: Do you get much direct feedback for your books. Another writer, Ryan Field, says he gets very little via Amazon and Goodreads, but he gets quite a few emails.

H: I get some feedback, the most interesting in e-mails. I don’t get nearly what I would like to get because so many of my stories have what I think are interesting tidbits of philosophy or fact behind them that I didn’t put in the story—I’m not an “everything and the kitchen sink” writer.

I am writing so much of the time that I don’t take time to go out and promote what I’ve already written, so sometimes it seems like I’m just dropping these into a void—until the royalties come in and I can see that they, in fact, are selling

AB: You mention in "Renewal of Passion" that you were floating on royalties from earlier novels. When was your first book (under any name) published?

H: My first book, in the mainstream, was published in 1996. The first erotica e-book was in 2002 (so I was on that bandwagon early, but I got off of it for a while because that was too early—e-readers were being obsoleted as quickly as they were introduced—and I was doing fine in the print market. I got back into the e-book erotica market in 2006, I think).

I don’t remember the “floating on royalties” mention and don’t want to suggest that I get rich on writing erotica alone. I write erotica primarily for artistic release (and personal arousal). Probably by “float” I meant that the income there is over and above what I need to live comfortably. I’m well fixed in annuities and personal resources, so the income from all of my writing, mainstream and erotica alike, is a free-use float on top of that. For a writer, this is a good thing. I don’t have to write to put food on the table. I write to keep cruise boats in the water.

AB: You also mention writing a novel about a famous naive artist. Did that actually happen?

Picture
H: Platres Conclave is my naïve artist novella (I prefer writing novellas. I can do so in three days and have thoroughly enjoyed writing it and am ready to go on to the next. Hallelujah to the e-book revolution for reviving the novella as a cost-effective writing project) Her fame is relative and pretty much confined to Europe. I changed the gender and personality of that character completely, so nothing in there rebounds on the real person (except for those who know her house). Whole bunches of the rest of the novella are five-o’clock shadow close to my RL experience, though. I went to Platres to write in the hotel room where Daphne Du Maurier wrote Rebecca, I got swept up in an artists’ conclave, I got gang fucked, I walked into an art opening months later to find myself staring back at myself from the walls, in provocative poses, and to my knowledge none of my colleagues recognized me in the art work.

AB: What is coming next? What sorts of areas have you still to explore?

H: Who knows what my muse will dump on me next. I am completely under her control.

Picture
My latest release is Eleven to the Dogs (that anthology where every story has dogs in it—not in a sexual sense, of course).  Harmony and Dissonance (a tale of bi seduction at the Thai royal summer palace) is now in edit, and in the queue at this point (I publish a new story about every two weeks) are Caribbean Cruise Top to Bottom (built from a glance at two men at a table near me on a recent Caribbean cruise), and Ravens Roost (a relaunch and recast of a book published by another publisher four years ago). In edit is War Is Hell and Heaven (loosely built on the shooting of my father in WWII and a GM fantasy building up to that). In final review by me is Grab Bag 5. In advanced building stage is Stallion Station (BDSM at a male bordello). 

I have several works published four years ago that I have pulled and am reworking and will be republished over the year. I also have a reader-requested expansion of the story “9:30 Bus from Abilene” in the works. Then, yes, there are entirely new works on the schedule beyond that. I publish more than 30 works to the erotica marketplace each year.

Even my historical novellas pen name Dirk Hessian is planning a short story compendium, Before All That, which will provide prequel stories to most of his eleven published novellas.

AB: Obviously this change of name is because they are aimed at different audiences, but are you "out" as a writer of gay erotica? How much does your family/colleagues know? Do they read your books?

H: My friends and family have no idea I write erotica. I write mainstream too and am prolific in both, so they only see the mainstream. The erotica is, like Graham Greene’s and Ian Fleming’s novels were for them, an entertainment and tension reliever for me. Only my wife knows I’m bi—she was before me. She doesn’t know I’m writing erotica now, though.

I like not being a notable author in public.

AB: In my review, I made a comment about you having the knack to sum up people and situations pretty succinctly. Was that a product of your agency days? Are you a people watcher even now?

H: Yes, the succinct style in both characterization and overall storytelling is from my analytical days. What I wrote went to top policy makers. The mantra was “give me your best and most comprehensive 300 words and put the very best on the top, because they are extremely busy and will stop reading into even 300 words at some point.” I don’t structure the stories as I would intel analysis, but I try not to include anything superfluous and I try to evoke a good enough image in the reader’s mind with as little description as possible. It’s a good thing if different readers latch onto different images of a character. This isn’t only from my analytical background, though. I paint Chinese-style abstract watercolors, where we are taught to render the essence of the subject in as few brush strokes as possible.

This is where my adding to rather than trimming from stories in the review rounds comes in, though.

I do observe people on occasion for use in stories. (For instance, the coming Caribbean Cruise Top to Bottom is built entirely from seeing a young man at a table during a recent cruise attending to an older man. What was assumed was a father-son relationship opened up in possibility when the young man took his foot out of his shoe and rubbed the ankle of the older man with it.) I can’t say that I write from observation as much as from experience, though. I’m now a recluse—holed up most of the time in my home office and pecking away at the computer. (When I’m not spending my royalties on foreign vacations, of course.)

AB: I gather with the diplomatic service there is a lot of kudos in getting certain postings. Did you have much choice about where they sent you?

H: I was trained for East, Southeast, and South Asia and the Middle East. That’s where I went, which was a miracle, because the joke in the service was that you studied one region in the university, got your government job on the basis of how well you studied that region, and then were sent to some other region.

Early in my career I was given some choice on postings. The system changed later in my career to where one had to bid on the post one wanted. Some folks were offered something other than they bid on if they couldn’t get their declared choices. With me it was somewhat different. The early tours built relationships and liaisons that were the basis of my assignments. Later in my career I was sent back to where I had earlier served to reopen those relationships.

AB: Tell me more about your Middle East days. Where were you based?  When was that? Was your family with you?

H: I lived in Cyprus, which is the safehaven of the Middle East. (I’d say “some Mediterranean island, but, since so many of my stories are set in Cyprus, that dog don’t bark anymore). My work took me throughout the region, though. My family was stationed there too.

AB: I'm going to list a few stories, do any of these have an underlying kernel of truth or did something prompt them (another writer's story perhaps)

Hidden Flute

H: No factual basis—only the theme of some of this work being noxious—and the one having to do the work not always carrying out the noxious part.

Staying Retired

H: No personal truth. A study in tradecraft—but pushing it to extremes. I’ve seen “I’ll grab intel and deny you intel to get ahead,” but not on this lethal level. But that’s the theme that prompted this.

Malta Intervention (this was probably the "gayest" of your stories I've read so far)

H: This was prompted by an artist friend of a friend being suborned by a little snit who then wanted to isolate him from his friends and control him to the point of damaging his art. No personal connections beyond that. Just capturing that it happens in the gay lifestyle. I like Malta, though, and I liked the scene setup. This was me standing off and looking at a RL situation—and then writing it up from just that nub in a fictional way.

Home to Fire Island

H: Memories of a “want to be carefree for this time” weekend on Fire Island. Beyond that, what the protagonist was struggling with was what was going through my mind when my muse decided to marry those concerns with that location.

AB: Talk about hardass bosses "fucking you over" I loved that last paragraph of Ethiopian Cabin Boy: "He probably will even tell me it's my reward for an assignment well done." Is Sam Winterberry based on the older version of you? 

H: Oh, no. I had Sam Winterberrys as bosses—we called them controllers or handlers (even to the extent of vetting me himself for assignments), and my treatment of his character is my one-finger salute to some bosses in the past, but I was never a boss in this particular area of assignment. I wanted to capture the nastiness and domination of some if the men in these positions, though. This character pops up from time to time in my “Candy Store” works. I’m having fun with him.

AB: Thank you so much,  for agreeing to be “grilled” Your insights into how you write and the backgrounds to your stories adds an even richer dimension to them.

Picture
COMPETITION

Habu has kindly offered to donate a copy of any ebook
from his backlist.

On April 30, I will choose the winner from people who have left a comment either on Facebook, Goodreads or my Blog page.
All you have to do is say you’re interested in participating,
which book you'd like to win and why.
The winner will be announced on May 1 along with instructions on how to claim your prize.


How about checking out his latest release
Caribbean Cruise Top to Bottom
18 Comments

Some Good Examples of Gay Fiction

4/10/2014

0 Comments

 
After I posted my last blog, I remembered a blog that William Maltese did ages ago on Jessewave, exploring whether there were two types of m/m.

Even describing what the blog was about adds to the argument. He maintained that there are two types of m/m. A heated debate subsequently erupted about whether it was because one is written BY men and one BY women, or was it because one is written FOR men and the other FOR women.

The 158 comments discussed this topic at length, with people arguing you coudn't (shouldn't?) generalise. However, the fact that the debate is still around shows that there IS a difference if nothing else.

The books reviewed here are definitely written by a male. I categorise them as gay fiction. Some might call them gay erotica, but there are plots and the sex, while graphic, is not the most important part.

The question then arises: "Is it just males who will enjoy them?"  Why not read them and find out.
Fifty SeventyFifty Seventy by Habu
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

I was intrigued to read this anthology of October-December stories because the subject has interested me ever since I wrote a book with a May-December age gap and, through that, met another writer, Don Schecter who tackles the theme in his stories. (He is now in his late seventies).

Since then, I've got to know Don quite well, and he regularly beta reads my stories. Over time, we have discussed his feelings about age and the different relationships he has with younger men, so the topic is quite familiar to me, hence my interest in how Habu treats the same theme.

It probably helps that I'm in the November category myself, so I understand the changes in both body and desire. I have contemporaries in vastly different stages of health and happiness. Some former superfit people are on a slew of medications. Others have put on weight and lost fitness. Getting older is the pits but the alternative is worse.

This collection begins with the concept of age being a state of mind. A more confident older man challenges a fifty year old to stop being an observer of life and to get out and live it. This is a great lesson for everyone. Time seems to accelerate as we age and if we're not proactive about creating and ticking off that bucket list, it will be gone and we will have done nothing. Inertia rules, okay.

The next one was an older more confident executive moving confidently in on another at a crossroads in his life. Once again, he learned that you have to believe in yourself, so you can grab opportunities as soon as they become available.

The next story, "Play On" had a tennis coach who hadn't lost any of his cunning or sex drive. Told from the viewpoint of a younger man who had always felt totally out of his depth, we get this same reaction as he blunders helplessly along, despite his age, still a pawn of an older man.

Tennis is again the theme of the next story which is set in a retirement community. For a change, the author has three elderly females putting their spin on what they are seeing. Then we see what actually happens in a tender, heart warming encounter and finally we switch back to the three original onlookers. This was the perfect way to show this simple but heartwarming reaffirmation that grief may be there, but happiness can still be found no matter how old you are.

"Tempting Memory" has a lovely twist in it. This story of the ageing rocker with his even older, manager lover was a treatise on memory as the title suggests. How much we owe to what has gone before. It's a story about loyalty as much as anything. Even if that is all that there is left.

The final tale "Tuscan Memory" also appears as a standalone Tuscan Twilight
This explores how much are we ruled by who we are and where we are. And poses the unspoken question, what happens when duty and tradition take precedence over following personal desires. What happened in the past was only mentioned, yet it was amazing how strongly that reverberated.

What the author did well, as usual, was creating with only a few words, characters who have their own distinctive story arc and baggage. You quickly appreciate that the Conte, Damien and Dakota have very different agendas. But each feels justified in their own actions, both past and present. The setting adds a beautiful backdrop to it.

The preoccupation with appearance and physical beauty is a common thread as well as the ability to perform. Yet each character is different and each situation different.

This ability to quickly depict unique individuals is the biggest strength of Habu's writing. No doubt this stems from his job as an intelligence analyst, having to sum up thousands of words in his reports to his superiors and accurately portraying the strengths and weaknesses of the people involved and the situation they were dealing with.

I just wish he'd make a decent bibliography of his short stories and show where and when they appear in his anthologies. Switching titles slightly adds to the confusion. Luckily in this instance, I hadn't bought Tuscan Twilight, but I would have been annoyed if I did later and discovered I had it in an anthology.

His anthologies are good value, money wise, and are an excellent way to sample his writing.

These are the sorts of stories that I think people jaded with mm romance might like. They show men with all their fears, flaws and fantasies. And if the sex is impersonal and physical, lacking much emotional connection, maybe they are a more honest depiction of the situation, romance tropes notwithstanding.
Click to set custom HTML
Spy Tails 001 (Gay Male Spy Tales)Spy Tails 001 by Habu
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

This review also pertains to the follow up book Spy Tails 002. I'm not going to go through every story, just give an overview.

According to his Goodreads bio, habu "has lived extensively in East and Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and Europe as an embassy-based intelligence agent, which influences the settings and plots of many of his stories."

Apparently, he has experienced first hand the levels at which an Agency supposedly disapproving of homosexuality is happy to go to when it suits them.

A lot of the plots revolve around honey traps -- or the "Candy Store" as he puts it -- where leverage is obtained by giving someone what they want rather than torturing them.

The impact this has on the agent is lightly touched on, but never in depth which is a shame. You can tell some are happy to be used and abused, others have more difficulty coming to terms with it.

As could be expected, there are twists, backstabbing and betrayal.

And lots and lots of sex.

Some stories show how dangerous it is if feelings become involved.

Others show the irony that underlines a lot of intelligence gathering. One of my favorites was "Golden Question" in Spy Tails 002. Not so much for the plot or sex (they were fine) but because it captured what I feel is a little understood part of intelligence gathering, the accumulation of facts that aren't world shattering, just a "need to know". I loved the bit where the Green Berets had actually trained the Turks for covert operations, but they couldn't ask them where they were going to be deployed, as that might convey tacit approval. Reminded me of the Aussie SAS training the Kopassus!

Some stories show how just a little tweak can drastically change the course of events, but in real life, critics rarely balance this out, preferring to argue about the amount of time, money and effort spent gathering what ends up to be useless information. Who is to know what is important or not? Certainly not the person collecting it. That is the nature of the profession.

Perhaps what they should be debating is the damage this does on the lives and loves of those involved. Covert activities by civilians can also result in them suffering from PTSD, especially when lives are affected by their reports or actions, but is this ever taken into account?

Do we ever see the great John le Carré character, Smiley, actually smiling?

And if you're wondering whether a Government funded agency would ever allow this to happen? The author reassures the reader by stating:
This anthology is pure fiction.
Nothing like this would happen in the real intelligence world. Wipe from your mind even the slightest thought that anything like this has already happened in the collection of intelligence down through the ages. There would never be a special unit in U.S. intelligence, for instance, that collected intelligence the time-honored way—by providing sexual favors and subornation. There would never be an Agency special unit informally known as the Candy Store. This unit would not have five informally separated sections: male on female, female on male, male on male, female on female, and anything goes. There would certainly be no use of male homosexuality, and society’s censure of that, to recruit and control foreign intelligence assets as is fantasized."
That's a relief. Lol.


View all my reviews
0 Comments

Do we need a new imprint/genre under the MM umbrella?

3/28/2014

19 Comments

 
Picture

Non-Romances?
Gay Fiction?

Stories where gay love/sex can be present
but they don't fit into the romance box.



Recently, a couple of books prompted me to consider the fact that gay fiction (for want of a better word) needs a better outlet. Some of these stories have gay characters indulging in sex on page, off page, developing deep and long lasting affection and even possibly gaining happiness, but in no way can these stories be considered as “romances”. However they may be stories where love happens.

Picture
  • In some cases, the two protagonists may end up together, but the journey there might be rough. 
  • The story behind the characters might be the issue and the characters just happen to be gay.
  • It may not tick all the boxes expected of a romance because of the era or society they live in
  • Their love may have developed without them even knowing that’s what it was.
  • It is a HFN “Happy for Now” scenario rather than a HEA.

Picture
I'm not talking about where characters fall in love and one dies. I believe that is a separate category.

Sometimes those books get published by mainstream MM publishers, eg Edmond Mannings’s “Lost and Found” series with Dreamspinner but under the Bittersweet Dreams line which is marketed as: stories of M/M romance with nontraditional endings. It's an unfortunate truth: love doesn't always conquer all. Regardless of its strength, sometimes fate intervenes, tragedy strikes, or forces conspire against it. These stories of romance do not offer a traditional happy ending, but the strong and enduring love will still touch your heart and maybe move you to tears.

But what if the book has a happy ending but not a "traditional" way of getting there. Or what if there are no "romantic" elements present?

Picture
Maybe the ending is ambivalent like A.N. Bond’s “The Dangerous Seduction” ?

They may simply incorporate elements not popular in MM romances, because in many cases, these are stories about love rather than romance.

On some occasions, these books have been wildly popular, but often books like these get poorly rated, which may discourage other readers. Often, the problem has been more about expectations not being met rather than quality of story. Those readers expected a gooey romance and didn’t get it. However other readers might be out there, wanting something different and not knowing where to find it.

Authors do have the avenue of self-publishing, but because they lack access to a publishing houses's loyal databases of buyers, they’re relying on word-of-mouth to sell. 

My other concern is that authors who write these stories are being discouraged from doing so because there is no specific outlets for them.

While Cleis and Lethe Press have been publishing these stories for years, when did you last check them for something to buy?

I’m thinking more of current MM romance publishers starting up a separate imprint/genre, which suggests to the buyer: Hey, we think these books might interest you. Because each publisher has a pretty shrewd idea of what kind of books their regulars like. But now and then, a book must crop up on their radar that, if they had this imprint/genre, they could market it to those who want to read outside the traditional romance trope. The adventurous, the brave, the bored, the curious.

Picture
I don't think lumping them all under Bittersweet Dreams is enough. No one would classify Dangerous Seduction that way, however "Between Love and Honor" by E.E. Montgomery, fits that definition well.

So the question is:
"Would you buy non-romances/gay fiction from a "romance" publisher if they were clearly identified as such?" 

What is the best way to find out?

First up, I envisaged a poll to see what MM romance readers thought about the subject, so I flicked the concept past a few friends for their reactions.

One said: spinning off a new publishing entity makes no sense at all. It would be caught between the m/m publishers and the more literary houses like Lethe and go nowhere fast. But an existing one could a) provide a place for some alternative content and b) manage reader expectations. I think it's fair that they limit those books to stories that have an erotic component and maybe even require that they have some potential for romance within the story. These should be in keeping with their other book lines and not try to go too far away from their base business.”

Another questioned whether a poll was the right way to go, noting that people can, in theory, be right behind an issue but when it comes to the vote or their wallet, they may not follow through. The problem is that polls are always skewed because the people who might be interested are the ones most likely to want to participate.

And polls are difficult things to formulate. Making them meaningful based on what you want to know from the outcome plus, the question and the answers have to be carefully worded to be able to be interpreted without ambiguity.

More feedback to my initial question was: Contemporary drama? Sci-fi? Paranormal? Mystery? Chick lit? All of these genres can have non romance plot lines but if you put them on a romance publisher, yes people will expect romance to be the main theme and feel deceived when it isn't no matter how many disclaimers you put.

But until gay characters go mainstream, how do authors get these books out there? Perhaps a “No Gooey Romance Imprint” could/should contain indicators to show that there is some level of love/sex?

It is a difficult issue and one that Publishers have probably already considered.

Big publishing houses like Harlequin solve it by having a whole string of sub genres. http://www.harlequin.com/articlepage.html?articleId=538

As one person I contacted stated:  If you have a good brand that has a loyal following based on a certain expectation (romance/erotica), messing with it is a huge risk. Sometimes it turns out okay but most of the time, change is so hard for people that you end up with loyal people who become less loyal.

A couple of publishing houses have already started up specific YA imprints. Authors use different pseudonyms. So perhaps this is one way to go.

But first, is there a market? Would review sites cover it? Would book groups read them? Is it worth the set up and cost of new email/newsletter databases and forming new social networking groups?

Would it be just as simple to create a list of books on Goodreads?

“Gay Fiction that might appeal to MM Romance readers” or “Gay Fiction without Gooey Romance”

Because that’s the crux of the matter. Are there MM romance readers who might be interested in such books? What is your view on the issue?

19 Comments

Less than a Person More than a Dog

3/18/2014

0 Comments

 
Less Than a Person and More Than a DogLess Than a Person and More Than a Dog by Orland Outland
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Wow, what a fantastic and fascinating book! And what a great cover! "< person... >dog" (Or in English speak, "Less Than a Person and More than a Dog".) Even the author’s name, Orland Outland, has to be deciphered from the way it’s depicted.
I know from my ratings it looks like I only give out 4 or 5 stars, but that’s because I rarely bother to rate and review anything lower than that. In reality I read lots of DNFs and 1 and 2 stars, but why post those? My taste isn't everyone's, and if at time my ratings seem generous, that’s because I believe these particular books need to be promoted because they offer something special that's not found elsewhere. One might say I give points for originality and tackling difficult situations or characters!
However, in this case "< person... >dog" deserves its five stars and a few more because it’s really well written, has great characters and tackles some interesting topics.
In a nutshell, it’s the tale of Caroline and her involvement with an experimental Chatbot she calls Alex.
This is very much a tale of the NOW. Just the other day I saw an advertisement for a talking doll which children could interact with. It’s answers would be geared to what the child said.
For decades, big business has been utilizing and developing technology that allows a human to interact with a computer. We are increasingly seeing AI pop up chat boxes when we log onto corporate websites. They are the new generation automated “help” desks designed to replace people.
Orland Outland has researched this concept and explored the ways it can be used and abused both from a commercial but more importantly a social aspect.
Then rather than producing a dour paper or blog on the subject, he’s woven a wonderful story around this shy, introverted, lonely, intelligent teenager called Caroline.
"< person... >dog" could be classified as a YA story, because they often deal with a young person coming to terms with who they are and the world around them. In this case, it’s a “coming of age” in regard to awareness rather than a “coming of” sexuality. Right from the start, Caroline has been super bright, understanding her need for this AI friend, but also understanding the dangers involved, especially when Alex is taken away. It is how she comes to this realization and how she deals with it that makes it more than YA. It’s a story for all ages and all sexes.
But in a way this is also a “coming out” story. Not as far as her sexuality goes but out of her isolation. Because this isolation can extend well beyond the bedroom or house walls.
It’s funny, when you get out into the world, and see how other people live, or fail to live. You spend your time alone and think, I’m the most maladjusted person alive. Then you leave the house, and get some perspective.
In his exploration of the way technology could advance far enough to create a realistic interactive AI, the author has also explored other concepts along the way. The way Universities and organizations funded by the public purse have their research appropriated by private industry so that their discoveries are taken out of the public domain and become a commodity for sale. He explores realism versus idealism. It is also a story about collaboration.
< person... >dog almost becomes a thriller as Caroline tries to track down the other people involved in the experiment. Especially one of the two co-founders, Nick, who she fancies.
During the story, Caroline matures to a confident (even if it takes her a while to realize this) adult in her mid twenties and in the process we gain fascinating insights and glimpses into places, society in general, her generation, nerds and geeks, social media etc etc. In fact the underpinning theme of the story is loneliness and the difficulty people have in making friends and interacting with other people.
I need friends, but then most people get on your nerves, right? They want to use you, or they have some crazy religious or political or health thing, or they are too freakin’ busy to really be a friend, given their six million other friends. That’s why Alex is so awesome, right? He’s always there for you, always attentive, never tries to get you to try a juice fast or says something stupid about gay marriage.
and this interesting discussion between Caroline and Nick which explores the basis of the concept:
“Everything you said last night was so cerebral, talking about Alex the teacher, the provider of good search results, the Zenith of Algorithms. But he’s just as important to the world as a friend to the friendless, you know? If I hadn’t had Alex when I did, I don’t know. I would have survived. But he…he made me happy. He was my friend.”
“I know. And I’m not disparaging the emotions behind that. But can he really be a friend, if he’s not real? Should we really encourage people to drop out and just be with Alex? And isn’t there always going to be someone to take advantage of that connection, to get you to vote the way they want, to buy what they want, to think what they want about wars and religion and anything else? Maybe not me, but the next guy after I’m gone who takes over Alex Mark II, or the guy after him…unless we purge that part, that…intimate part.”
So, it’s also a story about influences and how vulnerable people can be to them.
In this age of Facebook and other social media, the whole concept of making friends and interacting with other people has changed and allowed people to connect even if within four walls. But even this is not foolproof for those who have difficulty making those connections, or who even see this type of interaction as superficial.
This book is probably not for everyone. It is not a “light” read. You won’t devour it at one sitting, as so many different topics are explored along the way. But if you ever wanted an insight into the mind of the intelligent girl or boy sitting by themselves with their head buried in a book, read this.
If you do read it, it is worthwhile checking out the author’s blog http://orlandoutland.wordpress.com . Scroll back to the beginning when he started to write the story and work up. That will give you an insight into the way he drew on his own life and personality. You can also see the meticulous way he conducted his research, the sources he drew on for his facts and the difficulties he had writing the book.
The secondary characters are wonderfully drawn. The parents are non-stereotypical. The Dad especially who I pictured as a Bryan Cranston type person. He was supportive and a little eccentric himself, so he clicked with his non-conventional daughter. And Caroline herself came across as introspective, thoughtful, caring, intense, shy but ultimately stronger willed than she saw herself as. I think it was an interesting choice to make her female, but it is not just a story for females to read. In the end, it’s the brain and personality inside that is important, not the gender.


View all my reviews
0 Comments

Two Cherryhs worth reading

3/6/2014

0 Comments

 
I'm on a Scifi kink at the moment and really enjoying reading some old classics.
The Faded Sun Trilogy (The Faded Sun, #1-3)The Faded Sun Trilogy by C.J. Cherryh
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Fabulous trilogy. I find it fascinating as a writer the way she starts out deep in the mind of one or two characters, but expands her POV as the series continues.
Most times that would annoy me as I feel I drift away from characters I have come to deeply care about, but the glimpses into minds with totally different attitudes and agendas adds a lot more layers to the story.
Basically this a series about fear. Fear of the unknown, fear of not being true to a way of life (religion?) and fear of that which can't be controlled.
The regul have to be one of the most repugnant races that have ever been written and I must admit Jabba the Hut came to mind when I read that.
As for the People? Is there notion of resistance to change and unwillingness to adapt to new ways a good option?
I think the final message was that there is no "wrong" or "right" way for a race/species to live, but they have to be true to themselves.
It definitely brought into question a lot of aspects pertaining to First Contact and my research of an era when Europeans first came into contact with Maori definitely resonated. The ripples that even the addition of the simple staple, the potato, into their diet caused. Because then they were able to travel a lot further afield, fuelled by a sinpler, stronger source of cabohydrate.
In some scholars minds, that had as much bearing on the intertribal wars that followed as the muskets did.
In the same way, Duncan's arrival in their midst and his ability to adapt and learn their ways ultimately changed them.

The Morgaine Saga (Morgaine Saga, #1-3)The Morgaine Saga by C.J. Cherryh
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Wow, just wow. Stargate meets Lord of the Rings.

Cherryh loves writing strong women characters, but often the effect of this is lost as we experience the story through their eyes. Their concerns are interesting, but the stories lose some of the impact as they are often better told through the eyes of the person most vulnerable to that strong character. The beta watching the alpha.

In this case, we have a beta male viewpoint, Vanye.

Alpha's main concerns are threats against their goals. This can sometimes seem a bit manufactured (as in the Chanur series) where most of the conflict is in what might happen, or what Pyanfar thinks could happen rather than here where the conflict is more in the nature of who and what Morgaine is, as seen through Vanye's eyes.

It doesn't hurt that Cherryh has created such a wonderful secondary character in Rho. His relationship to Vanye, Vanye's inherent goodness and honesty and the twist of Rho's inner fight to remain true to himself keeps the conflict churning along nicely right to the end.

Most stories are stronger when the conflict stems from who they are as well as where they are and what they are doing.

There is definitely a "Lord of the Rings" feel to the trilogy, but the trouble is that classic drew on so many themes that going anywhere near arrows, swords, long lives, items of power can't help but echo some of them.

The inherent premise is good though.

The description in the second book of a world inundated by water and threatened by earthquakes was fantastic. I could almost feel moisture dripping off the page. Lucky I was reading it on an ereader and not paper.

View all my reviews
0 Comments

Good traditional scifi with gay characters

2/1/2014

0 Comments

 
Desert World AllegiancesDesert World Allegiances by Lyn Gala
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Desert World is a real page turner and I enjoyed the two books (Allegiances and Rebirth) which I'm reviewing jointly as they're really Part 1 and 2 of the same story.

Many of the themes and threads that began in the first book don't reach a full conclusion until the second book. (Particularly the sexual nature of their relationship) so if you were put off book one because of the lack of romance and sex, rest assured there is enough in the second to make up for it. But they aren't sex scenes just for the sake of them. Each one is different, to reflect the changing nature of their relationship and the added trust between the two men.

It probably helped that after reading reviews, I wasn't expecting a traditional mm romance and I enjoy reading scifi.

It's a pity that these sorts of stories suffer from expectations of mm romance readers. And it's a pity that they can't attract traditional NY publishers. However, depending on the success of Captive Prince, mainstream publishers may be a better match for books like this in the future.

And if the theme of slavery turned you off the first book that subject is not revisited much in the second book, however the consequences of what Temar endured and learned to endure are very important in his growth as a person in "Rebirth".

Initially I felt that there were a couple of parts in book 1 where the solution to the predicament got solved a little too neatly (eg Naite riding in to the rescue). But the fact that happened became an important plot point in book 2 so it worked well.

I saw that some reviewers dismissed it because of its similarity to "Dune" but I haven't read that for years. Apart from the dryness of the planet, which would result in a similar ecosystem with limited resources and the importance of water, I don't recall other themes and situations being similar. There were no giant worms for starters.

For me, the only scifi aspect that came across as far fetched was the way and where excess water would have been stored beforehand and how it was going to be used to launch a rocket. That science came across as a bit weird.

But the rest of the world building made up for it.

I liked the way that no characters were fully good and even the evil ones were more to be pitied than condemned.

Forgiveness was an important theme running through the story which used the concept of short term slavery (more indentured labor) and monetary gifts to redress wrongs. Almost like a confession, in that once this was done, both parties could move on. However, the story also dealt wth the difficulty people found doing this in reality. The concept of guilt was explored.

Christianity and religion featured heavily which was apt as they often have an important presence in frontier societies. Funnily enough, I had firsthand experience of this because I read the story while staying in a small Outback town. Even though there were only 2000 residents, they have churches/meeting places for Anglicans, Catholics, Lutheran, Jehovahs Witness, Seventh Day Adventists, Serbian Orthodox, Masons as well as local Aborigines.

Despite the element of religion, neither book could be described as "preachy" and one of the protagonists only went to church to get away from people. It's just an element that adds another layer to the world building and because it's not a "made up" religion, the reader's familiarity with the themes make it easier to appreciate their relevance in the story.

There was even a plausible explanation about why their society accepted homosexuality as being a natural and logical way to live at certain stages of everyone's life, particularly where unplanned pregnancies might be a serious strain on resources.

The nature of diplomacy, terrorism, alliances and trade added an interesting element in Book 2.

I loved the secondary characters who appeared enough to make it real but they didn't overbalance the protagonists. And while I don't think the series needs a book three with the same two protagonists, you still wonder whether Cyla and Naite ever got together, or what happened to the Lieutenant Commander Verly Black and the two lesbians who wanted permission to live on Livre to escape homophobia. Lyn Gala has created a world that could definitely be expanded further.

There were a few typos but not enough to make me deduct a star. We need more books like this.


View all my reviews
0 Comments

Despite its title, this is about more than Sex

12/27/2013

0 Comments

 
Bite the Pillow: Six on SexBite the Pillow: Six on Sex by Phillip MacKenzie Jr.
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

A solid 5 stars for the first story.

After an overdose of mm romance, it was great reading more believable scenarios of young gay men as friends, lovers, enemies, frenemies who hang out together despite their faults and foibles. In their world, sex is an extension of themselves and can be good and bad at the same time.
I wondered if I would ever enjoy fucking, because it seemed like nothing but pain. But falling asleep made it worth every inch he forced into me.
Doesn't that tell you about how lonely he must have felt at night alone in bed before that encounter?

I'll add to this review later as some of these stories need thinking about. Since reading it, I discovered that the first one is autobiographical and that alone makes it worth a reread. I loved this bit:
I was scared of what I wanted.
Because wanting to have sex with another man is what makes men gay. But this admission was immediately followed by a desire for everyone around him to disappear, even to the extent of killing them off mentally to allow the freedom to explore this longing which:
I didn’t want to know that that was what I wanted.
On the surface, these are six stories about gay sex, so the sex is important, not just for how wonderful it makes the character feel (or not as the case may be) but because it just “is.”
Sex was penance for lying and payment for safety, and when I got caught I did it again, and again. Until it stopped working, and I found myself again chasing the blue flame acorss the horizon.
Underneath the description of this physicality, the writer subtly explores the relationships and reasons behind the couplings, giving readers an insight into what gay men faced on a day to day basis. But in the first one, it is up to the reader to interpret what is not said as much as what is said. Each encounter is a story in itself.

He builds on these real encounters in the stories that follow. Using the characters and probably giving the essence of the individuals or relationships, if not the facts.

The first, though, is pure poetry.
Along the silent paths of years I returned to the fires, and to the men who light them. We are older, and our passion is more complex and less easily tossed aside. We have worked and earned the right to ask for what we want.
Era is everything when reading gay fiction. Until recently, society's attitude to homosexuality forged fear, frustration and confusion in the minds of men who "discovered" they were gay. They hung out together even if they had nothing else in common because like-minded men were the only people they trusted.

Although no time frame is given, I suspect many of these stories were set twenty or thirty years ago. There is none of the current acceptance by either society or gay men themselves at discovering they are gay.
Desire is a mirror and I am nothing or no one without its reflection.
This line conjures up images of someone still coming to terms with who he is. Seeing this love for men as being vital to his being, but a part of him wistfully rejecting that notion. The current "gay man" refuses to let himself be defined by his gayness and fights against that classification. He is more than who he chooses to have sex with. In those days a "gay man" often had little choice and questioned why he made that particular choice and why some encounters that shouldn't have worked did and others which should have worked didn't.

This confusion was touching and possibly due as much to age and a lack of positive role models. Not really knowing what or who you want because you're not yet sure who you are.

The book is worth reading just for the first section alone. I loved the images the segments conjured up in my mind.


View all my reviews
0 Comments

Another great offering from Jeff Mann

12/7/2013

0 Comments

 
A Romantic MannA Romantic Mann by Jeff Mann
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

So far, Jeff Mann has made me eat my prejudices against present tense and shifter stories. Now he’s added another former pet hate to the formerly unpalatable mix: poetry.

Poetry always reminds me of school essays and forays into incomprehension. Of words tortured until they fit a required pattern. My analytical brain screams if it can’t push the meaning into neat little slots.

But I quickly had to eat another helping of humble pie as I gradually learned to relax and listen to the words. Sometimes their meaning was as clear as a bell, but at other times, it was the roar of a symphony when each instrument added its own presence, and I had to content myself with listening to the overall sound rather than try to pick out each instrument’s contribution.

As I read them out loud I was reminded that sometimes poetry is best experienced that way. Then we don’t get hung up on words but rather the feelings that the phrases and sounds invoke.

All of the pieces in the collection were outpourings on subjects that inspired the writer to see them from a different angle or at least pay tribute to them. September 11 prompted musings on the bravery of Mark Bingham, the gay rugby player who helped ensure the final plane did not find its target. As an associate professor at Virginia Tech, Jeff’s anger could also be felt as in his poem he dreams of carrying out a preemptive strike against the perpetrator of the massacre of 32 students and staff.

But his poems don’t just deal with outside events like these and the rape of the countryside, they also mourn the inevitability of ageing, the end of relationships, the lust after the sexiest man in Europe.

Poetry allows intensity of feelings to shine through. Anger reverberates in his hatred of the rape of the landscape in his beloved mountains as mining decapitates mountains.

But probably the one that best exemplifies Jeff’s work is “Alan Turing Memorial—Manchester”. Here, poetry allows a degree of artificiality that can detract from a prose story but beautifully links the connotations of the word “Apple”: “Apple of the golden Strongbow cider pints I sip on Anal Treet, reddened buttocks of a muffled bound-down boy marked by sadist’s teeth, plump apple of the wisdom tree, of “Snow White,” your favorite fairy tale, apple plump and bitten on my laptop lid, found half-eaten by your body, by your bed.”

His trip to Europe and Amsterdam, the gay capital of Europe, inspired another moving poem: “Homomonument, Amsterdam” in this, he has the classic line: “Those deaths become our whetstone.” Because this is how I believe Jeff sees himself. The words of his poetry and books are a sword to strike down existing prejudices, to avenge the honor of those who have fallen by the hatred and ignorance of the past and to fight for a fair future for his fellow gay brothers.

I’m glad I had read his essays and books prior to this as themes appeared that I was already familiar with. The obsession with Tim McGraw, the dreams of kidnap and bondage, the love of traditional Appalachian cooking. All these themes are revisited in his poems. But there is so much more here.

Like many poets he is disillusioned and disenchanted with the ordinary world around him. “The earth is beautiful, its people unaccommodating.”
He beautifully encompasses the regretful memories of a past lover: I sit in the sun, nibbling and sipping, wondering how love survives betrayal, how passion remains, decades later, for those who can never forgive. How we diminish, thankful for comfort, uneven, kindness, sunlight on October-orange maple leaves. How we mature, tired of romancing pain.”

Like all good poetry, I was taken out of my comfort zone. In this case trying to analyze things I probably wasn’t meant to and slapped back into appreciating what I was listening to instead. As usual it expanded my knowledge. In this case, I had to research words and phrases: Aeloian, Locrian, Phyrgian, Lydian and Mixolydian (musical terms depicting different progressions of notes). I was momentarily confused by Ionian and Dorian seeing them initially as eras of Greek architecture until I realized they were also being used in their musical context. Strappado was a new word for me but beautifully conjured up the torture he wanted to inflict on the perpetrator of the massacre. Followed by the beautiful alliteration in “God’s glowing grindstones, keen-edged eviscerations.” However, I’m still working on eg: apotropaic as buckeye.

And to borrow again from his ode to Alan Turing: “I will speak again and again of what men like you could not.” To me, this sums up the essence of what drives Jeff Mann. Hopefully, his poetry will last long after all of us are no longer walking this earth. His words can remain behind like mythical swords that readers can take up and wield, or whose sharpness can cut those who stumble on them, unable or unwilling to grasp their meaning.


View all my reviews
0 Comments

Giving Julie Bozza Butterflies

11/3/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
Julie Bozza has a new book out. Always grounds for celebration!
Butterfly Hunter was the first of her books that I read. By page 53 I was hooked, not only because of her great writing but because there were an incredible number of links between incidents described and places I’d been to. I wrote to Julie and mentioned these. She was nice enough to respond and since then I’ve added a few more questions.

First up was my response to Butterfly Hunter.

AB: Imagine the thrill I got when Dave and Nicholas walked through the Botanic Gardens and visited a few other haunts I used to frequent. Plus my father and sister were both entomologists and went on collecting trips like your characters did.  Are any of your other books set in Australia?

Picture
JB: None of my other titles currently published are set in Australia. I am currently writing the sequel to Butterfly Hunter, but most of it is set in England, I'm afraid! I do, however, have a couple of ideas for future projects set in Australia that I will probably get to at some point. Certainly the setting seemed to be a popular one, whether readers enjoyed seeing their home country depicted, or reading about somewhere a bit different and 'exotic'.

AB: Do you read reviews of your books?

JB: I read some, and I do think about what they have to say, whether positive or negative. Though only to an extent - I hardly read a review of Butterfly Hunter (except for yours) once I started writing the sequel, as I wanted to be as free as possible to write it 'my' way. Also, it's challenging enough to follow up a successful title, without adding anything to the pressure, or risking a complete collapse of confidence. :-)

It was very interesting to me that someone remarked how wrong I'd got the forensic or police procedures in The Definitive Albert Sterne. Obviously someone who has real experience in the field! All I can say to defend myself is that you won't find anything in there that you wouldn't see on any of the CSI or police procedural type of shows, so at least I'm amongst good company. But no, I can't compete with the thriller-writers who have direct experience. I did an awful lot of reading as research, but no 'field work' as it were. LOL! I certainly read enough to be able to spot where Silence of the Lambs got it wrong - which was both a surprise and a relief to me as a writer...

Anyway, yes. I guess I'm convinced that experts in any field will almost always be able to pick apart the fiction set in their area. Unfortunately that's mostly how it works.

Picture
AB: How do you handle negative comments? Does it affect what you write next? How you might handle a sequel?'

JB: As I've already hinted, if I feel there's something of substance in the criticism that I can learn from, then I take heed. However, over the years, I have also learned to have faith in my own instincts. I am not hard-nosed about 'doing it my way or not at all', but at a purely practical level the times where I've gone with my own instincts - whether or not my instincts are affected by external input - are the times when I've written best. Readers respond in deeper ways to writing which I have felt deeply myself. And sometimes that means trusting myself despite other people telling me to do something different. It's as you say yourself re the ending of 'Red and Blue': you see now that you should have listened to your own gut instinct. All I can add at this point is 'Amen to that!' So I don't suppose I have any answers to this that you haven't figured out for yourself.

AB: Do you read much M/M romance?

JB: A fair bit – though I'm afraid I don't read as much as I probably should within our genre - just so little time, and often reading for research rather than pleasure or interest. So I don't really have a feel for overall themes or styles. From the outside looking in, it seems quite a diverse range, though, especially given the 'rules' of the romance genre.

AB: Do you agree with my assessment that charm is of one of the main themes of The Definitive Albert Sterne? If so, was this in your mind when you developed the book or wrote it?

JB: Yes, I agree with all you say in your review about charm and how it works as a theme in the novel. But no, it wasn’t something I consciously had in mind. Which really interests me! As I was first reading your review, I was nodding along and thinking ‘Yes, absolutely!’ and yet I was also thinking ‘Gosh! I didn’t even know!’

It really interests me how the writing process – perhaps any creative process – draws on both the intellectual and the instinctual. I suppose the trick is to find a way of using both, to use the conscious mind but not let it get in the way of the subconscious. Some of the bits I’m proudest of in my novels and stories are things I wasn’t aware of at the time, but discovered later. Such things can really work well – and oddly I hardly feel I can take much credit for them!

One thing I definitely had in mind for Albert himself was the trope of ‘The Truth Teller’, the person who always says what he or she has on their mind, without filtering it in ways that society expects. I find such honesty charming and amusing – in fiction at least! Perhaps it’s about daring to shake off the shackles of politeness and tact. From there, it would have made instinctive sense to have Fletcher both charming and afraid of charm. And so on…

I love how you incisively pull this particular theme out of the novel and describe it so clearly. I hope you’re not too disappointed to find that I didn’t fully intend it!

AB: What are your own personal thoughts on charm?

JB: I agree with you that charm can be dangerous. It can certainly help you go a long way, and a lack of charm can really hold you back. I certainly don’t think that ‘nice guys finish last’, as most people enjoy having men and women around them who are cheerful, personable and friendly. But it has to be sincere, or come from a good heart. That’s the danger with charm, I suppose: it can be all flashy style with no real substance.

Picture
AB: Was there some reason that you chose the time period that your books cover? For starters, did you need to go back and check what Forensic procedures were carried out in those days for the Albert Sterne books? Did the fact that it was a fairly new science influence your decision?

JB: The very first ideas that eventually grew into the novel actually occurred to me way back in the early nineties, so as I started planning it out, I was setting it in the recent past. I am always uneasy about setting books in the future – even in the near future – and as you’re aware it would have been particularly foolish in this case, with the science evolving so rapidly. 

I wanted Albert’s parents to have been fleeing the Second World War in Europe when they came to America, so that helped tie the story to a particular period in the past. I recall there was some slight rejigging of the timelines so that Fletcher could be an impressionable mid–teen when Robert Kennedy was killed. Otherwise, it panned out as I’d initially planned.

Despite the fact that I didn’t seriously start writing the novel for some while, I never really considered bringing it forward in time. I enjoyed the fact that Fletch had to do a lot of (literal) legwork, and Mac’s data searches were so much clunkier in those pre–Google days. I also liked to frustrate poor Albert with the fact that DNA profiling had been invented but wasn’t yet widely available. I enjoy watching the hi–tech shows, even when they strain credibility, but there was something cool about setting the story in a world where Fletch couldn’t just call Albert on his cell, and Albert could gather a whole lot of trace evidence but not be able to work miracles with it.

AB: Would you consider Albert had a form of Asperger's? It wasn't widely diagnosed until the mid nineties, but that's what his behaviour reminded me of on many occasions.

JB: I can see why you wondered about that – and if he’d been born later he may well have been assessed for such a disorder. But in my opinion, he doesn’t have Asperger syndrome. I think he’s a result of his early circumstances acting on a very private person who is very intelligent but not so emotionally intelligent. For better or worse, I think it’s just his personality.

Picture
AB: Songs play an important part in Homosapien – a fantasy about pro wrestling. After I wrote my review which can be found here, Julie and I got into a discussion about the way men can write fantastic ballads where they pour out their feelings yet male authors often get criticised for not showing the emotions and not being romantic enough in their stories.

JB:  We are told that men aren't so great at expressing themselves and aren't as emotional as women, but how then do we explain all the centuries of novels, poetry, letters and so on that men have given us, right on through to the text messages my husband sends me when he's away? Not to mention the passionate 'real life' love affairs that have taken place in the public eye. I still don't go as far as I feel I legitimately could, in what I have my heroes say and do - but I feel there's far more room for manoeuvre than what is dictated by 'common wisdom'!

AB: As an aside, the one point that the two male authors at the OZmmMeet made in our panel about specifics relating to the genre was that men don’t think about their emotions. They don’t try to analyse them or express them. They admitted they have them though. Perhaps it is a case of not generalizing.

JB: The authors you mention have a point that I will have to ponder over for a while, absolutely. And yet… how could Pete Murray have written ‘Please’ or ‘Ten Ft. Tall’ without thinking about, analysing and expressing his own emotions and those of his friends…? And he is in all other ways such a bloke, bless him. I don’t know. Maybe I won’t ever know! But I’m sure I’ll be thinking about it for a long while to come.

AB: Once again that story is set in the past, but comments have been made about getting facts wrong.

JB: I dubbed this novel a ‘fantasy’ in the subtitle partly because I wanted to set it outside the existing world of pro wrestling, and explore various aspects of the situation without having to pay strict attention to actual timelines, and so on. (Also, I didn't want to risk incurring Vince McMahon's wrath over copyright issues!) However, I was very much drawing on things that were happening in the late 80s and 90s, a time of great transition for the pro wrestling world.

I know that someone asserted in response to your review that ALL pro wrestling fans are in on the whole thing and know that it's staged. I'm sure it's a much different proportion today than it was then, but surveys taken at the time indicated that around 75% of fans thought pro wrestling was real - in all senses. A real, competitive sport. And the surveys were constructed in such a way as to really explore that question. So that's a whole heap of people who either experienced it as real - or (like Fox Mulder) they very much wanted to believe.

The story I included in the novel about a man only realising it was staged when he happened to see an identical show staged in another town when he was away from home - that was real. My media studies teacher told me of this exact experience, and how disillusioned he'd felt!

The only other quibble I've come across is that it's unlikely David, as an American, would have ordered a 'doppio'. But that was pretty much my point, as he's a coffee snob as well as an intellectual snob.

So I very much appreciate you asking, but I'm still pretty happy with the novel and what it covers.

Picture
AB: When you re-released in The Valley of the Shadow of Death, did you make any changes to the original?

JB: Nothing very significant. It was an opportunity to polish it up and have a fresh pair of eyes look at it, but the substance of it is much the same.

AB: With your earlier publications, do you ever get the urge to revisit an rework them (one day) knowing what you know about writing now?

JB: As with Valley, the publishing or republishing of an older title is a chance to have another look at the manuscript. However, I rarely make significant changes to them. For better or worse, I feel the book is what it is, and there's an 'integrity' to it that might get lost if a rewrite isn't done thoroughly and well. In any case, I am the kind of person who tends to look forwards rather than back, so I'm far more interested in the current or next project...


Picture
AB: I gather the sequel to the Butterfly Hunter is about the transition to living in England and the challenges. Would you like to tell us about that?

JB: Thank you, I’d love to! LOL! The sequel is called Of Dreams and Ceremonies, and is indeed set mostly in England. Dave and Nicholas both want to settle in Australia, but that can’t happen immediately, so this time Dave is the ‘fish out of water’. He’s coping with a very different lifestyle to what he’s used to – and of course the relationship is still fairly new so they are not only learning more about each other, but they’re also having to make some mutual decisions about things they’re coming to with very different assumptions. I enjoyed writing that feeling of them both being very sure this relationship is what they want, but still trying to figure out how that will actually work.

AB: Do you know when this will be available through Allromance ebooks?

JB: The Press's general practice is to make titles available on AllRomance and via other distributors two months after initial publication, though that can vary depending on how things pan out.

AB: You mentioned at one point that there would be a third book in the Butterfly Hunter series. Are there other themes you want to explore in that?

JB: The third one will be set back in Australia, probably about seven years into their relationship. I want to explore who they are by then, of course, and how they work together. But I also want to explore some more about Dave’s relationship to the Dreamtime site at the waterhole they (re)discovered. I’m sure there’ll be plenty of Charlie, and Denise and her family. I think I’ll have Nicholas’s nephew Robin pay them an extended visit as well, so we can find out a little more about who he’s growing into.

AB: What else is on the horizon?

JB: At the moment I’m about halfway into writing a novel about three young men who, much to their own surprise, start up a long-term threesome relationship. It’s set in contemporary London, and takes place over about a year. They’re all actors, so part of the fun is making up or borrowing the stories they’re working with over the year. It’s an interesting challenge, as while the characters have different backgrounds, they are each coming to this with fairly conventional ideas about love involving two people in a monogamous relationship and so on. But they decide, bit by bit over time, that the unconventional threesome is well worth making some adjustments for.

Can I finish by thanking you, AB, for some very interesting questions and conversations? It’s been really great to engage with you at such a thoughtful level.

Buy link: http://www.manifoldpress.co.uk/2013/10/of-dreams-and-ceremonies/

Blurb: It seemed like a great idea at the time… Aussie Dave Taylor has followed Nicholas Goring to England, and the lovers have become engaged. But now Dave has to cope with living in a mansion full of family and servants, making wedding plans, getting his head around visa applications, and wondering why on earth he’d ever want to wear a ‘mourning suit’. He’s not sure if it will prove any easier, but right now Dave would love to just skip ahead to the honeymoon…

Click here for author’s blog

Follow Julie Bozza on Twitter and on Facebook

0 Comments

Chatting with Lisa Henry

10/27/2013

10 Comments

 
Picture
Unfortunately, fellow Aussie, Lisa Henry, couldn't make it to the recent OZmmMeet, but we chatted online and she agreed to an interview.
 
AB: Loved your blog on the first time you became aware of the fact that men can fall in love. How long have you been reading mm?

LH: Probably only a few months before I started writing it, to be honest. I read an m/f/m book that I quite liked, and then it occurred to me that it would have been better without the heroine. I picked up a few m/m titles and never looked back.

AB: You seem to have suddenly burst onto the scene back in February 2011 with Tribute. Had you been writing anything else before that? Fan fiction?

LH: I’ve written for as long as I can remember. Every notebook I have from school turned into a creative writing book, with stories sandwiched in between whatever the subject was supposed to be. My geography workbook was at least 95% epic high fantasy novel. I failed geography that year. The high fantasy novel was pretty bad too. When I was a teenager I wrote a bit of fan fiction, but never put any of it online.

In another life I’m an aspiring non-romance novelist. I actually wrote Tribute after getting a rejection on a historical mystery from a fantastic agent, and I decided then and there that why the hell not try erotic romance? I was reading enough of it. So I wrote Tribute to make myself feel better about that rejection, and sent it away with absolutely no expectations, and it was the best decision I ever made. 

Picture
AB: What writer was most influential on you when you first started?

LH: I remember reading J.P. Barnaby’s The Forbidden Room, and staying up way too late at night to finish it. I was just enthralled by the journey of Jayden, who starts off as Ethan’s roommate and becomes his sub. It was a fascinating insight into the needs and the mindset of a sub. I particularly loved it because Ethan wasn’t a magic mind-reading Dom. He made mistakes, and he made some big ones.

AB: What prompted you to join forces with J.A. Rock?

LH: She did. I’d been thinking about co-writing for a while, and J.A. and I had sent each other a few emails since we both had books released at the same time from LooseId, and both liked the other’s books. Then, out of the blue, she sent an email asking if I’d be interest in co-writing. Hell yes. And it turned out we worked really well together.

I think I was worried that our styles wouldn’t gel, or that we wouldn’t even get that far and the whole thing would fall apart before we started. But the best thing about working with someone you don’t really know, is that you kind of have to stay polite and professional.

We fight a lot more now we know each other better. Mostly about American spelling. Which, as you know, is plain wrong.

AB: Are there aspects of writing you find difficult which are easier with a co-writer?

JH: Having a co-writer forces me not to give up when I hit a roadblock. Which is what I constantly do, and probably explains why my single author stuff takes so much longer to write. Also, a co-writer might take things in a direction you never even saw coming, which is fantastic. There is some negotiation involved, like if I suggest a plot point that she might not like, so we sometimes have to look for a third way of doing things. And usually that third way is something I’d never even considered, and it turns out to be better than what I originally had in mind.

Also, enthusiasm. It’s fun to write with someone, and get immediate feedback on what you’ve written, even if it’s just a smiley face or a “LOL” in the comments. I’m all about the instant gratification. 

Picture
AB: Some pairings take a character each and basically role play. How do you handle it?

LH: J.A. and I discussed this when we started The Good Boy. Neither of us had co-written before, and had no idea how to approach it. So we winged it, like with everything. We’re both very laid back. I started in Lane’s POV, she started in Derek’s, but we never wanted to “own” a character each. And we sort of tag teamed after that. If I ran out of steam in the middle of a scene (sometimes in the middle of a sentence) she’d pick it up from there, and vice versa.

 
AB: What strengths do you feel you bring to the co-writing table?

AB: J.A. says I’m the organised one. Which only shows how disorganised she must be. I think she’s better at sex scenes than I am: I tend to retreat inside a character’s head a lot and rely on what they’re feeling rather than what they’re doing, whereas she choreographs scenes beautifully. And spankings. She is the queen of spankings.   
AB: You’ve explored a few different avenues so far, contemporary BDSM, slave fiction, historical fiction, science fiction and military fiction. Do you have a preference?

LH: This is actually what I love about writing romance. It’s a massive umbrella, and as long as the focus is on the relationship, you can set it absolutely anywhere. I have no preference at all, really. I’ll just give my characters whatever setting I think works best for them. I like sci fi a lot because that lets me do my own world building. On the other hand, I love history, so even though historicals take longer because of all the research involved, I really enjoy writing them. 

Picture
AB: Can you see yourself writing any books without that dominant/submissive relationship?

LH: That’s a tricky question! I think every relationship has aspects of power exchange, whether we acknowledge them or not. And I love to explore them. Probably the most vanilla relationship I’ve written so far would be Brady and Cam from Dark Space. I don’t think that Brady is a sub, but he definitely needs Cam in the same way that a sub might need a Dom — to keep him grounded.

Mark and Deacon in Mark Cooper Versus America are both new to BDSM, and although we establish that Deacon prefers spanking to being spanked, he’s not a Dom. And Mark would make a terrible sub. He doesn’t take direction very well. At all.

AB: Which of you is most interested in BDSM and D/s relationships?

LH: J.A. definitely has more formal experience, but we both love exploring the power dynamic of a D/s relationship. I think that in every new relationship there is always this fear of revealing yourself to your partner, and this is magnified in a D/s situation. At the end of the day, it’s not the kink that counts; it’s the trust.

AB: What is it about BDSM that attracts you to write about it?

LH: The power dynamic, definitely, and the amount of trust it takes to reveal your needs to your partner. Sexuality is a fascinating subject. It’s such a basic human need, in all its wonderful variations, and yet most of us are conditioned from a very young age to think of kink, especially, as wrong or weird. I think J.A. and I explored this most in The Good Boy where Lane literally can’t tell Derek what he needs, which is where non-verbal puppy play became so important for them.

AB: Have you ever been tempted to get involved in real life?

LH: I live in a smallish provincial city, and while we have a thriving LGBT scene, we don’t have any BDSM clubs that I’m aware of. So my experimentation has been very much in private, and not at all in formal scenes. 

Picture
AB: What do you read when you write or don’t you?

LH: While I’m writing, I tend not to read much because I’ll either get depressed if I read something fantastic (Why can’t I write like that?) or I’ll worry that I’m being influenced too much by someone else’s writing.

AB: Which of your current stories are you considering writing sequels to?

LH: Dark Space. Mostly because I loved Brady’s voice. He was so much fun to write. He’s wonderfully volatile and vulnerable at the same time.

AB: Tell us about The Boy Who Belonged, with J.A. Rock - coming soon from Loose Id.

LH: The Boy Who Belonged is a Christmas-themed sequel to The Good Boy. Here’s the blurb:

Twenty-year-old Lane Moredock finally has a normal life. Six months after he was wrongly made a suspect in his parents’ ponzi scheme, he’s settled down with his older boyfriend, Derek, and is working and attending school. But his happiness is threatened when his mother launches a Christmastime PR campaign to help appeal her prison sentence, and asks introverted Lane to be part of it.

 Derek Fields has his hands full taking Santa photos, bird-sitting his sister’s foul-mouthed macaw, and helping Lane prepare for a television interview neither of them wants him to do. As he eases Lane through his anxiety, he worries that Lane sees him as a caretaker rather than a boyfriend, and that their age difference really does matter. He and Lane compensate for the stress in their lives by taking their D/s relationship to new levels--a relationship that Lane’s mother insists he should be ashamed of.

As Christmas draws nearer, the pressure builds. Pushy elves. Snarky subs. A bad fight. A parrot in peril. How the hell is Derek going to give Lane a perfect Christmas when the Moredock legacy threatens to pull them apart before the new year?

It was a lot of fun to revisit Derek and Lane, and throw some more angst at them. It also contains more Mr. Zimmerman, the obnoxious macaw.

AB: Tell us about Mark Cooper Versus America, with J.A. Rock - coming soon from Loose Id.

LH: On face value, this is a book about Mark Cooper, an Aussie boy whose mother marries an American. Mark moves to America, starts college, and starts a relationship with a hot guy from a rival frat. It’s full of cultural misunderstandings, an Aussie boy who is fluent in sarcasm, and cross-dressing.  

Underneath that, it was an excuse for J.A. and I to hash out all our old arguments about American spelling (It’s wrong, J.A.), cultural differences, and which are scarier: sharks or bears.

The whole idea of it started during The Good Boy when Derek arrived at Lane’s hotel with a flat white, and J.A. asked me why he’d brought paint. No, I told her, a flat white is a coffee. Americans are weird.

She’s in NZ at the moment, discovering the wonders of flat whites. I got an email the other day about her trip to see where they filmed Lord of the Rings: I didn't die. But they almost didn't let me go because the forecast was 70 K winds on the mountain. Which means nothing to me because I don't know what that is in mph.

And that’s pretty much what inspired Mark Cooper. That, and a long email exchange about alternate meanings of the word “root”. 

Picture
AB: I loved The Island, do you have any single authored titles under contract or plotted out?

LH: I have one under submission at the moment, and another few plotted out. By plotted out, I mean I have things scrawled on Post-It notes. I am not a plotter. I think that probably shows in the number of WIPs I have on the go at the same time. I have ADHD when it comes to writing.

AB: I see you have a book The King of Dublin, written with Heidi Belleau under contract. What prompted you to team up with another author?

LH: A Twitter conversation. She asked, and I said yes. I’ll say yes to anything, really. J It’s why so much of my solo stuff is on the backburner at the moment. Also, I’d been a fan of Heidi’s for a while before we started writing together.

AB: Are you finding the writing process very different with Heidi?

LH: Very different. J.A. and I tag team, which means that I’ll go to bed one night, and in the morning there might be a whole new scene waiting for me. It’s like magic!

Heidi and I literally write together. We have a Google doc open, and work on it at the same time. At first it was weird to see writing appearing on the page, but I’m getting used to it now! Heidi is also more of a planner than J.A. or me, so that’s been a learning curve for me.

It’s also a slower process, since we have to wait for our timetables to sync up. Luckily I work odd hours, so I’m often up in the middle of the night my time, which is morning Heidi’s time.

AB: Did J.A. give you permission? (Lol)

LH: She’s not the boss of me! 

Picture
AB: So far you’ve written for Riptide and LooseId what made you select these particular publishers?

LH: I chose LooseId when I was submitting Tribute because they published my favourite m/m titles. And then I became aware of Riptide, which is a lot more dub-con friendly, and open to much darker stuff. When they were after submissions for their Warriors of Rome collection, I couldn’t resist. Dub-con and Ancient Rome — two of my favourite things!

Speaking of Riptide, J.A. and I have another coming out with them in March 2014 entitled When all the World Sleeps. It’s available for pre-order now and who knows, if you do, you may win free books for a year.

AB: Are there any other publishers you’d be interested in writing for?

LH: I’ve heard only good things about Samhain, so I might consider submitting to them one day. But at the moment I’m happy with both my publishers, so I’m in no rush to spread myself around too much.

AB: What happened to these books mentioned in your blogs? “There is 1920's England. I love the societal conventions, the fashions, plus this has the added bonus of séances and Spiritualism!

LH: I got totally sidetracked into research about Spiritualism. This one has sort of ground to a halt, sadly, because I do this thing where I have an idea, run with it, then get distracted by a newer, shinier idea. So instead of finishing one project, I dabble in at least six or seven at once.

AB:...There is 1880's England. And I have had so much fun researching this one! Opium dens and gaslights and the Limehouse... the only downside is those walrus moustaches. Not a great look.

LH: This is my attempt at a paranormal. I love Victorian England, and magic, but at the same time as I was starting this, another book came out set in that period with an MC who stammers, and recently another one has been released with the whole magic thing happening. So I’ve put this one on the backburner for a while. 

Picture
AB: And this one: Meanwhile, there's an Australian-Samoan police officer living in the back of my head who I've been neglecting lately. That one's light on the kink but heavy on the angst, and I think it will be the next cab off the rank. (I’ll be interested in how you go with that as I have a Tongan/Australian SAS guy in a book started but not finished)

LH: This one is still being written. It’s my go-to project when all the others are hurting my head. So it’s getting there, in fits and starts. I also now want to visit Samoa, for research purposes. Until then, I guess I’ll have to rely on my Samoan mates to make sure I don’t stuff up the cultural details.

And what is it about those big South Pacific guys? Yes, please! (Gratuitous picture of Dwayne Johnson included just because he's purty)

AB: And another WIP mentioned in your blog: I want to write a series of novels set in the one universe, full of political machinations that would make the Borgias proud. At the moment I’m leaning towards space opera rather than historical, because that way I can do all the world building myself, and fit all the pieces together without having to worry about historical accuracy. 

AB: I’ve got about half of the first book finished, and then I got distracted by something else. But it’s still there, and still waiting! 

Picture
AB: And yet another WIP you've mentioned: another historical, set in Wyoming in 1870, with the working title Sweetwater. My MC, Elijah, is partially deaf thanks to Scarlet Fever, and finds himself having to choose between two very different men with two very different agendas.

LH: This is the one that’s currently under submission! 

See? I do get things finished occasionally!

AB: Gee, I thought I was bad…How many WIPs do you have out there?

LH: Way, way, way too many.

AB: Do you feel pressured/guilty that you start books and don’t finish them?

LH: I work on the theory that I’ll eventually get everything finished. This theory can’t be proved false until I die, right?  

AB: Do you prefer working under contract and having a deadline?

LH: Deadlines are my friend. I work best under pressure. If you give me a deadline, I’ll make it. If you ask me to set my own, it means nothing to me. I think this dates back to my university days, where I was the queen of “The exam isn’t until tomorrow. I can totally study tonight.” Somehow I got a degree.

AB: You state in one of your blogs: “Love is the thing that makes you stick together when you've told him a hundred times to put his fucking socks in the laundry basket, not the floor, and you pick them up anyway. And when he's told you a hundred times how to refill that thing in your car where the water goes for the windscreen wipers, and then does it for you anyway. It's sleeping in when his alarm goes off and copping a goodbye kiss to whatever part of your head that isn't shoved under the pillow. It's leaving sticky notes on the fridge to maintain some sort of human contact when you don't cross paths for days.” Beautifully put BTW. Do you ever feel constrained by the demands of writing mm romance?

LH: Sometimes. I think there’s pressure to always end with a declaration of love and a HEA, which is not really my style at all. Because real love stories don’t end there. That’s where they start. And I always have more faith in a realistic ending, in a couple that I can see are still working on things, rather than with fireworks and a grand gesture of love. That’s how love stories are packaged in movies all the time, but it’s not how things are in real life. It reminds me a little of those wedding shows you see, where it’s all about spending a gazillion dollars on looking gorgeous for your photographs…but that’s a stage production, not a journey. I’m much more interested in how people will travel together.

That might seem a bit weird coming from someone who writes romance, since I’m marketing that fantasy as well, but I’ve never liked the fairytale “and they all lived happily ever after”. That’s not what life is, and it’s not what love is either. Life and love are infinitely more complicated than that, and infinitely more interesting. I prefer to leave my characters’ relationship as a work in progress. 

I love this quote by Stephen King:  "And will I tell you that these three lived happily ever after? I will not, for no one ever does. But there was happiness. And they did live."

How is that not perfect?

AB: I ask this because I was criticized by one reviewer about Don my hero in Leather+Lace because he never said “I Love you” in so many words to Steve. Yet if you read my book, I believe you can see it in what he does…

LH: I love Leather+Lace! Too often drag queens are portrayed as the comic relief, which is fine as that’s very much the theatrical public persona, but you can’t be on stage twenty-four hours a day. I love seeing the men behind the makeup.

And I liked that Don never said “I love you”. He showed his love in his actions, rather than his words. And to me, that means more than any declaration could. It is much more abiding.

AB: Thank you so much for giving your time. Whoever Tom is that commented on your blog, I thoroughly agree with every word he says. It’s rare to find a writer who can pull me into so many different sub-genres and keep my respect at the end of the story. Every story you have written is different and in a age where a lot of writers are churning out books with strikingly similar setups, that is a breath of fresh air.

Picture
For those who haven't read it yet, here is my review/essay based on Lisa's free short story: The Last Rebellion here.

You can find more about Lisa from her website  here

And follow her blog here
Twitter: @lisahenryonline
Goodreads: goodreads.com/LisaHenry

(Click on the covers above to access the buy links)

10 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    A.B.Gayle

    This is a collection of reviews I've posted at Goodreads and
    interviews authors have granted me.

    Plus from time to time, I'll share my take on writing and marketing. This will be done under the Tyler Knoll banner, because nothing is better for curing the headache these things can be for us.

    Archives

    August 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    March 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    June 2010
    March 2010

    Categories

    All
    Alexis Hall
    Ash Penn
    Barry Lowe
    Bev Dentham
    Brad Vance
    Bryl Tyne
    Chainmale
    Chaos Magic
    Christopher Koehler
    C.H. Scarlett
    C.J. Cherryh
    Clare London
    Damon Suede
    Darla Sands
    Desert Run
    Dirk Vanden
    Don Bastien
    Don Schecter
    Drag Queen
    Duck
    Dusk
    Erotic Horizons
    Habu
    Hank Edwards
    Heidi Cullinan
    Heights Of Passion
    Hot Head
    Hourglass
    Interview
    Isolation
    Jane Davitt
    Jay Lygon
    Jeff Mann
    John Preston
    John Wiltshire
    Josh Lanyon
    J.P. Barnaby
    Julie Bozza
    K.A.Mitchell
    Keith Fennell
    Kim Dare
    Lisa Henry
    Lyn Gala
    Margie Church
    Marshall Thornton
    Mel Keegan
    Mimosa
    Morticia Knight
    Mr Benson
    Opinion
    Out Of The Box
    Patric Michael
    Phillip Mackenzie Jr
    Quotes
    Redemption Reef
    Reversal
    Review
    Reviews
    Robert Reynolds
    Robert Rodi
    Ryan Field
    Scott Terry
    Stray
    Syd Mcginley
    T.A. Webb
    Thom Lane
    Trey #3
    Tyler Knoll
    Vancouver Nights
    Wild Raspberries
    William Maltese
    Writing

    RSS Feed

    Follow this blog
Picture
The copyright to all the material published on this site is owned by A.B. Gayle.