I'm hoping to post a Q & A I did with Heidi, Check back soon.

Intro: Thank you so much for taking the time to answering my questions. First off, I’d like to say how much I've enjoyed your books. You write some beautifully complicated Doms and sluttily submissive subs. Twink (Charlie) has to have become one of those characters who will be remembered by anyone who reads your stories. Not that I don’t like Dave and some of the other subs you’ve written about. Each has their own personality and needs.

 Thank you! Twink took on a real life of his own once I’d introduced him. 

1. Your other pairings intrigue me: Hugh and Ryan, Rick and the Chef, Matt and Nick. I gather these were some of your earlier works. How do you see these stories today?

Yes, they were relatively early.  I’m very fond of these guys, and I had a lot of fun with them.  They’re more like visitors to my brain than inhabitants.  They don’t pester me like the Fell characters do. I’m pleased with the stories as they work in smut, plot, and character – which is a lot for short form erotica!  I’m an old-fashioned writer in many ways.  I like plot and people -- they need to be entwined.  Plot comes from the characters and their reactions, but – love yaoi and its “no plot no point” reputation as much as I do – I still want my characters to do something and grow – even just a bit.

2. Were there aspects of their relationships you especially enjoyed exploring and may revisit?

I’m a tongue-tied person when I’m in an emotional place and, for some reason, it rarely occurs to me to just ask!  I think I’ve convinced myself that I’m not allowed to ask. Ryan, Rick, and Nick all try to figure out what they are meant to be doing.  I think I let these three boys be my guinea pigs in the emotional consequences of saying or not saying things.  Tommy in the Felliverse seems to have claimed that trait in his dealings with Dr. Tanaka. 

I’m also intrigued by hierarchy (surprise!) and like to see what happens when someone is a literal superior in the eyes of the world -- by professional or social rank --  as well as a top.  

3.  I've been doing lots of reading of the m/m BDSM scene (in fiction) in preparation for writing one of my own books. Yours seem to be more about the D/s relationship and the needs of the sub rather than the techniques and rules of S/M that others seem to explore. Does this aspect of the BDSM scene interest you the most?

Yes, I’m interested in D/s as a lived life rather than as ritual and scene.  Rituals and scenes are grand, but for me discipline has never meant rules.  That sounds contextually silly I know, but it’s the spirit of submission and obedience -- finding a place that’s true to you – not being a cog or a crushed drone.  And I really really don’t mean I see structured BDSM that way – it’s just for me the draw is not about regulation.  I’m awful at following imposed arbitrary rules – school was bad and cube jobs were hell – but I do deeply value discipline, training, craft, and so on. A ritual that calms, sure, so long as it feels true to you and not artificial.  I think rituals have real power to center and ground a person. Whatever path gets you to your own inner discipline is what is right.  Some folks like rules and techniques to get there. I’m not a formal person, or a tidy one, or impressed by ranks.  But I do like structure, method/routine, and acquired skill/expertise. 

(Click on Read More to read the rest of this great interview).

AB: First off, congrats on your book “Vancouver Nights” I enjoyed reading it as much as I did the other two in the series. They make a refreshing change from a lot of the same old same old in the m/m scene. By page seven, I had done enough laughing to justify buying the book and what was good was that the laughs continued.

HE: I'm so glad Charlie made you laugh. He always gives me a good chuckle. He gets into so much mischief I have no idea how he's still alive.

AB: I loved your description of the way the woman got out of the car. A memorable entrance if there ever was one. Too often writers neglect little moments like that that can add to the uniqueness of a book. I also loved your eccentric cast of characters, especially Ming Ho.

HE: And I'm glad you enjoyed Ming ... I was concerned people would call me racist or something, but good God she just burst out of my head in this fireball of craziness. She and Billy will be getting into quite a bit of trouble, I daresay.

AB: As someone who has just discovered Corbin Fisher videos, the whole porn scene fascinates me. Were you aware how many women watch gay men’s porn? What is your reaction to that? Hopefully, I’m not as rabid as Ming is. I must admit that every time I watch them now (purely for research purposes of course), I visualize a Charlie behind the scenes just waiting to keep them ready for the next take. (Relax I know it's fiction)

HE: I have been very, very surprised by the number of women readers. When I started writing, I published in gay anthologies and gay erotic magazines like American Bear and Honcho. I never even considered women would find my fiction at all, I thought I was targeting an all male audience. Then I got a few emails from some female fans and I started to understand that women were really drawn to gay sex and LOVED to read about it! I was happily surprised, and I have to say, that's really fueled my writing.

AB: I find your writing very visual, I can picture your scenes really well, the barn scenes particularly. Do you visualize your scenes as mini movies before you write them?

HE: Thanks for saying my writing is very visual, I've always "seen" my books as I write them, like you said, "mini movies." I have a distinct setting and look to the characters in mind when I write and I'm glad those details come through. The barn was a fun scene to write, there was so much action (sexy and otherwise) and a number of fun, sassy characters to generate the drama. With Charlie I always try to have something funny and sexy happen in each chapter. He does work in the porn industry, after all, and he is a natural klutz. And thanks for the compliment about PWPAH, I think it's tough to pull that type of story off, and humor is especially tough with erotica. Here's hoping more readers will appreciate that as well.

AB: The book touched on so many different sexual variations and fetishes where does that leave you? Just how much research do you do? I know it’s fiction, but to satisfy my curiosity. Tell me, as no way could I ever get in there, do places like The Dirty Jock exist in real life? Are they really like that?

HE: The book did touch on many sexual fetishes. A friend of mine challenged me while I was writing the book by asking if Charlie would be branching out at all. I decided to introduce him to the watersports and fisting at The Dirty Jock. I have never been to a place like The Dirty Jock, but I've read about such places and I let my mind go wild and create this multi-leveled sex club where pretty much everything was acceptable.

AB: Will there be more adventures for Charlie?

HE: I am planning another book for Charlie and his friends, just have to get some time to write it. Right now I'm working on a zombie/vampire story so Charlie's on the back burner until probably June or so (fingers crossed). I've got some notes jotted down for his next adventure, and a few ideas for another 2 books after that. Who knows? Maybe he'll keep on going, as long as Lethe Press is willing to publish the books, I'd love to keep bringing Charlie back for more adventures.

AB: Thanks Hank for coming clean. Hopefully Charlie will stay clean until June...

As a writer, I find reading books by successful authors in my genre a very educational experience. What makes them successful? In many cases it's the sheer volume of quick, easy reads they produce. Carol Lynne, Stormy Glenn, Kim Dare and Claire being cases in point. Often (but not always) the standard of their writing improves as they progress. Even if they don’t, people who only give their books 3 stars are still happy to buy more when they come out. So they must be doing something right, right?

During the recent “Black Friday” sales I purchased a stack of Claire Thompson’s books. I’d seen her work rating highly on a number of lists but was wary because one of the first BDSM books I read was a m/f slave book of hers, which I hated with a passion. But then again, now there aren't many m/f books I like, so that's possibly more my problem than Claire's. I hate beautiful, perfect heroines....

As I’m a fast reader, I churned through the new books pretty quickly because they are easy reads. In a way this is unfair to the author as quirks in their style of writing and “voice” become even more apparent as do repetitive phrasings, words (nether hole – shudder) and themes.

One of things I did notice about Claire's books is that too often she builds to a climax like a kiss or a fuck and then before it actually happens, wham, bam she ends the chapter. You turn the page expecting to see the event and the time has suddenly shifted forward to the next day or even the next week and you may or may not get a description of what happened as a recall. (Golden Boy and Golden Man were filled with those.) So what should have been a “show” instead becomes pretty much a “tell”.

Another problem Claire had, and one that is shared by a number of writers: a lot of her characters’ narratives are big “tells” about how they feel about something. It’s sometimes as if they’re on a therapist’s couch. In a BDSM setting this can be appropriate as a sub is supposed to explore how he feels and relate this to the Dom (Jane Davitt's "Bound and Determined" does this very well). Mind you the Dom often doesn’t get this opportunity, so maybe that’s something to ponder (Syd McGinley's Dr Fell would agree with me on that one).

This is true of many other writers not just Claire, so it got me thinking about other things I feel many writers get wrong. (So the rest of this blog is really a general rant.)

For example, is this ability many heroes have to articulate and discuss the reasons they do things realistic? In my experience, while women still retain a lot of the ancient “gatherer” mentality in which the females had to consider and evaluate every berry, mushroom and vegetable they foraged and teach others, males in general still are the “hunters” who act first often without thinking, and it is only later at the pub, when they relax with their mates and have a few beers under their belt that they have the time or the inclination to discuss and boast about why they did whatever they did. Nowadays, sportsmen exhibit the same behavioural pattern.

In my experience, outside the pub, males rarely sit down time and time again and have meaningful heart to hearts.

Another beef in books? Switching to another character’s POV and giving a complete rehash of a scene we’ve just had without it adding much new. While I don’t dislike this dual POV aspect of the same situation, we have to learn something different, because if an author has established the character properly and the reader has learnt how they tick, we should have worked out what would be going on in their head without being told based on what they say and do. It’s only when they do something unexpected or out of character this “explanation” is needed when we switch POV.

Another thing I find is that too often, to get from point A to point B in an emotional arc, the characters merely make a decision to change their ways, do it and then explain why they did it to the other character. Sometimes in just a couple of paragraphs.

Authors, please don't rush the good bits.

Next conflict. The absence of decent conflict can be a death knell. Here's a good post from Alex Voinov on the subject: Five Things Burn Notice Teaches About Writing

It’s a well established dictum that all stories require conflict. This can be externally produced, the result of internal issues in a character, differences between characters, their lifestyles, their pasts. It can even be in the form of embarrassment and frustration. The whole point of romances is seeing how characters resolve and get beyond these conflicts. Preferably this requires a character to change their way of behaving, to learn lessons, to grow.

In many books, the conflict is in the initial situation ie the setup. This is often shown in the blurb. It is how the characters resolve this which makes a book memorable and different. Too often though, the resolution is too easy. Characters don’t have to change to overcome things. Either the conflict is made to be a non issue or if they do change it just seems to be a case of “Oh, I see the error of my ways, I’m going to change” end of story.

Finally, guys have to talk like guys. Get rid of the soppy, sentimental dialogue. Man 'em up Dude.

Because I’m trying to discover their secret, I do tend to be analytical and possibly overly critical when I read now. This possibly isn’t fair to some authors, but I need to discover what it is in their writing that I don’t like to ensure I don’t fall into the same traps and what I do like serves as an inspiration and a reminder to me of what I should be striving for.

Finally, don't make your male characters TGTBT (Too Good To Be True) that's nearly as bad as females being (Too Silly To Live).

Given the popularity of some author's books though, obviously female readers like this. A lesson I have to remember.....