Blog Archives

DUCK! by Kim Dare

10/27/2010

Duck! by Kim Dare
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

I’m not into stories about shifters, shedders and suckers.

Too often writers just use the alternate form to allow the character to do things they can’t in real life. Be more powerful, more dominant, more macho.

I’m a big fan of Kim Dare’s writing. I love her GAY stories. Yes they’re short, but each one shows her understanding of her characters and how their very nature affects their coming together and their relationship.

In Duck!, Kim has done three things and done them very well.

First, she’s taken the standard 15,000 word relationship story she excels at and expanded it by creating a new world around the characters.

Then she’s done the next step. The step her stories have been lacking, by finding the one thing that could threaten their relationship, and exploring what happens when this conflict eventuates.

Finally, she's used the shifting, not so much to explore the form of the different being but to explore what that form means. This shifting could even be seen as allegorical and relate to real life. What happens to a relationship when one of the duo inherits something or changes.

K.A.Mitchell did it really well in A Regularly Scheduled Life when one of the couple becomes famous. In this case, there's a change of role when one is reluctantly forced to accept his birthright.

Being about dominance and submission, as all Kim’s stories are, this shift in hierarchy places stress on the relationship and needs to be dealt with.

This isn’t so much an ugly duckling story as a story about understanding the difference between submission and subservience. It also exlores the difference between domination and superiority. I have trouble stomaching this relationship sometimes, but when you read something like this:

I thought about what my submissive would want. I thought about what he'd need in order to be happy under my protection.

You start to see how dominance in a way can be a form of serving.

The saying that every great leader sees himself as the servant of his subjects isn’t that far away from the truth. It would be nice to think that every leader who filled that role had someone behind them who knew what they needed and made sure they got it.

I can just imagine how Ori's relationship with the world would and should change over time as he settled more into his birthright.

Oh, and on a more important front. I love the way the curve of the "U" on the cover so lovingly curls around the guy's arse....

View all my reviews

FIVE STARS

0 Comments

A Bit of Mel Keegan and Josh Lanyon courtesy of Darla M. Sands

10/10/2010

0 Comments

Author interviews on blogs are tricky things. After a while with famous people you feel like you know everything about them. Sometimes the questions are fun but pointless. Sometimes they don’t push the author enough to find out what makes them tick.

Hence it was great to read two interviews which I feel are worth sharing. They are by Darla Sands who posts a monthly blog on “Nightlight – Browsing the Bookshelf”. She was happy for me to mention these in my blog.

Her first interview was with Mel Keegan. I’d come across his name a few times as one of the pioneers of m/m fiction, but I hadn’t realized he’s behind the GLBT bookshelf.

Browsing The Bookshelf ~ My Virtual Sit-Down with a Free Speech Champion, the Talented Mel Keegan
If you’re not familiar with Mel Keegan, you’re missing out on some great gay reads in genres ranging from science fiction, fantasy, historicals, and even comedy! His characters will stay with you, I guarantee, as evidenced by the pop status of his heroes in the ongoing NARC series.

Darla first asks: How did you come up with the concept for such a welcoming, not-for-profit wiki site?

Mel K: Remember the AmazonFail debacle? It hit me like a load of bricks, early in 2009 … if the big engines (Amazon and Google specifically) wanted to, they could filter the GLBT literature community out of existence. It could become virtually impossible for a new reader (or writer, come to that), to find anything or anyone online. Every new reader would have to be referred by word of mouth. And this could happen so easily, if or when the “moral minority” gets hold of the puppet masters who control the massive engines.

There’s actually a good deal of evidence to suggest that Amazon, Google and the like are extremely sensitive to the same part of the electorate which drove the Prop 8 shambles. Now, I’m not saying that we need to be paranoid about a “1984” style future … but one would need to be remarkably stupid not to allow for the possibility of a kind of persecution by filtering, or discrimination by censorship, if you prefer the term. And once you’ve lifted an eyelid and acknowledged what’s possibly looming out there, just over this hypothetical horizon, how dim would one need to be to sit back and do nothing about it?

GLBT Bookshelf was born out of this speculation. I wanted to set up a community that was so large, so sprawling, so far-reaching, that – if you’re interested in gay or m/m fiction (be it as a writer, reader, artist, publisher, critic, anything), the chances of you *not* knowing someone who is already plugged into The Bookshelf are close to nil.

Here’s the reasoning: even if the master puppeteers behind the search engines did filter us right out, we have a safety net to fall back on. Right now, I should think there’s upwards of 10,000 people around the world know about the wiki. Over 1000 have registered in some capacity. Around 500 are active contributors. If we were able to triple these numbers, I’d be happy to rest on those laurels I was talking about a moment ago, because I believe our reach would then be so far, and spread so wide, everyone even marginally associated with this literary community would know someone already on the wiki.

As an example of do-it-yourself networking, where *nothing,* absolutely *nada* is controlled by any major engine, the Bookshelf is absolutely at the apex. The whole thing is member driven, right down to the dollars and cents needed to run it. Amazon and Google could pull the rug out from under the gay and m/m literature community tomorrow, and we’re already there as the safety net. We just need to expand further – and even though the rate of our expansion has slowed down since the initial rush, it’s steady. We’re sixteen months old; in another couple of years we’ll have arrived.

For the rest of the interview click on the title above.

The previous month she’d also posted a very interesting interview she did with Josh Lanyon who starts off responding to her question about how he sets his goals.

The full text can be read here: Josh Lanyon's Interview

0 Comments

Jawing with Jay Lygon

10/1/2010

0 Comments

In my last blog post, I reviewed Jay Lygon’s excellent book “Chaos Magic”. I enjoyed it so much I sent Jay a message and a request to be “Friends” on Facebook (as you do). Once I was “accepted”, I read some of the back posts and discovered I’d just missed out on participating in a “Meet the Author” day that Jay was involved with at Torquere Press’s Yahoo group.

I would have liked to ask Jay some questions and take part in the discussions. I mentioned this to Jay who said “Fire Away”, so I did in a typically long waffling email. The answers and comments on some of my statements were so thoughtful and articulate, I wanted to share it with other fans.

I got the green light to re-post it in my blog, including the answer to the gender question I posed in my original review. Enjoy.

AB: I have this inner urge to deal with “difficult” subjects. I’m at the stage in my life when I’m not in this for fame or fortune. I want to add something to the genre, not just dish up more of the same old same old. However, I’ve been advised by my publisher and beta readers to concentrate on the humor. That’s why I found your book so inspiring. To show it is possible to stick with difficult subjects as long as I inject enough humor.

Jay Lygon: I used to tell people that I aspired to be the Dominic Dunne of gay erotica, but people just looked at me as if I were speaking in tongues. I think there's room in this genre to tackle serious subjects. Many writers will produce the m/m equivalent of a Mills and Boon or Harlequin romance, and many readers will want that level of escapism, and that's perfect for them. But then there are those other readers who want a deeper experience. There are fewer of them, but they're under-served. If you can't write breezy stories (I try, but always end up complicating things) then write what you're good at.

Chaos Magic has been out for almost three years now, and it just now seems to be finding critical mass in readers. Thank goodness for the long tails of e-publishing, because a print publisher would never give it that much time to find its way into the hands of readers.

So first question: Do you find adding humor difficult?

I'm a natural smartass, so no.

AB: Is it something you set out to do from the start?

JL:In Thomas Hardy novels, the unrelenting march into the dreary abyss always had me ready to slit my wrists. That taught me that after an emotionally heavy scene, the reader needs a break. The writer needs a break too. That sounds as if I think a great deal about pacing from the beginning when I don't. I just write the first draft and then worry about such things in the revision, but I've found that rhythm naturally occurs before I focus on it.

AB: I’m a plotser by nature and knew where I wanted to go (with "Caught") but wasn’t sure how to get there.

JL: That sounds familiar. I know my starting point and end point, but between home and the store, so to speak, there are many streets to take.

AB: Are there any other authors out there you can recommend that you find inspiring because of their ability to get the humorous tone right? (serious subjects or not serious)

Christopher Moore and Janet Evonovich come to mind as writers with a deft hand at comedy, but their subjects aren't serious. If there are writers out there who mix humor with heavier material, I haven't seen their work. That doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

AB: I’m still a pretty newbie writer so I do study and analyse reviews. (Both of my own books and other authors's stories).

JL: Mike Kimera, who writes straight erotica, has a sig line that says: "What you read is not what I wrote." So every reader brings something to the story that the writer never envisioned. That's cool and a bit scary at the same time. Sometimes, it means reading a review and wondering if that person read the same book that you did.

AB: Is it that they don’t understand the Dom/sub dynamic?

JL: Not every book is for every reader. Many readers want a fantasy Dom figure. Hector is deeply flawed. I didn't deliver the reader's expectation. That doesn't mean that they're wrong. It just means that Chaos Magic isn't for them.

AB: Or is it that some readers take their character’s worth at the face value of how the POV character sees them?

JL: Or maybe they're completely overlooking Sam's idealized view of Hector and thinking that something doesn't seem right about him. And they'd be right. Hector should be sending up red warning flags from time to time. Sam has pretty much proven that he's the worst judge of people, ever. From Marcus to Brett, he makes a lot of excuses for inexcusable behavior.

(Part of the discussion on the Yahoo group had been about writing stories in limited third or first person POV compared to multi character POV. “Chaos Magic” is told only from one viewpoint, but some of Jay’s other books are multi-third. I related my experiences then posed this..)

AB: I’m finding all sorts of reasons why people don’t like first person. The latest one being that women (who make up the bulk of m/m romances) find it a bit squiky during the sex scenes, especially writing it)?

JL: To answer the question posed in your review, I'm female. I don't have any problem writing sex from a male POV. What other POV are you going to get in m/m?

AB: Are you going to deliberately go down one path or the other or will it depend on the story?

I come from an erotica background. Erotica tends to be written first person because it's part of the literary genre. Romance tends to be written in third person. If the audience I intend to write for are romance readers, I try to write in third because that's what they expect. That's what feels "right" to them. I can't think of any other genre where the readers dictate the content and style of books to the writers the way that they do in Romance. Science fiction writers would go into vaporlock if a reader said, "I started to read your book, but it was written in first person, so I chucked it across the room." Romance readers say stuff like that all the time. On the other hand, when you're 50% of the book market, I guess you can say things like that.

AB: Next question: (You’re being very patient with me if you’ve got this far! LOL.
I see you write either paranormal or scifi. Not that I define “Chaos Magic” as paranormal. When I read it, I saw the Gods as either persona Sam overlays on real neighbours or products of his imagination designed to give him an “out”. However, maybe I’ll go with the paranormal definition. Is there a reason you’ve done this?

JL: I call it magical realism, but it gets lumped in with paranormal because what that's the big marketing umbrella that fits over it.

How you feel about the reality of the Gods is up to your interpretation, although the phasing is hard to explain away as Sam's imagination, as is the ability to make things appear at hand. In my interpretation, they are real gods in the Hindu view where godhood is simply a state of being like being a hungry ghost or a human, or any of the other possible states of being. It's not eternal.

AB: I noted at one point in “Chaos Magic” that Brett says: “By the way, I sent in our registration for the spring rugby league.” In LA is that another way of saying rugby competition?

JL: Brett and Sam play basketball in what we'd call pick-up games - meaning that they show up at the courts and they just start playing a game with any other guys there. There's no schedule and no set teams. Leagues are defined teams with scheduled games. They can be very competitive with uniforms and semi-pro coaches. On the other end of the scale, my sister plays softball in a mixed-gender league, and they keep a cooler of beer out by second base so you can have a drink during an inning. So some leagues are more about the social aspect, and the game is the excuse to get out of the house.

Why did I include it? When I wanted to show the guys playing sports together without having to write a game scene, I picked rugby because I have friends in New York who play on a gay rugby team (Gotham Knights) and that fit what I envisioned.

AB: Lastly, but by no means least. I vaguely recall reading somewhere that you write under different names. Are any of these in the m/m field?

JL: I have several other pen names. The only one that will matter to you is Kathleen Bradean. Kathleen is my girl smut pen name. Jay is for boy smut. I don't write m/m under any other name.

AB: Thanks for your patience. So much for my couple of limited questions, huh? I do this sometimes with authors I like. But relax, they'll tell you that after a couple of emails where I picked their brain for info, I cease and desist. LOL.

A.B. - I'm flattered. I'm also glad to share any info I can, so don't be afraid to ask.

What a honey. I'm really looking forward to reading the sequels.

0 Comments

DUCK! by Kim Dare

A Bit of Mel Keegan and Josh Lanyon courtesy of Darla M. Sands

Jawing with Jay Lygon

A.B.Gayle

Archives

Categories